206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18985680)
1. Fine-grained record integration and linkage tool.
Jurczyk P; Lu JJ; Xiong L; Cragan JD; Correa A
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):822-9. PubMed ID: 18985680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FRIL: A tool for comparative record linkage.
Jurczyk P; Lu JJ; Xiong L; Cragan JD; Correa A
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():440-4. PubMed ID: 18998844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological innovations in data gathering: newborn screening linkage with live births records, Michigan, 1/2007-3/2008.
Korzeniewski SJ; Grigorescu V; Copeland G; Gu G; Thoburn KK; Rogers JD; Young WI
Matern Child Health J; 2010 May; 14(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 19353254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics that predict locating and interviewing mothers identified by a state birth defects registry and vital records.
Gilboa SM; Mendola P; Olshan AF; Savitz DA; Herring AH; Loomis D; Langlois PH; Keating K
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Jan; 76(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16397888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a web-based integrated birth defects surveillance system in New York State.
Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Le LH; Steen PM; Babcock GD; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 18849767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.
Duke W; Williams L; Correa A
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Birth certificates as a source for fetal alcohol syndrome case ascertainment--Georgia, 1989-1992.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Apr; 44(13):251-3. PubMed ID: 7898420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program.
Cragan JD; Gilboa SM
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jan; 85(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 19089857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of the validity of a computer system for probabilistic record linkage of birth and infant death records in Canada. The Fetal and Infant Health Study Group.
Fair M; Cyr M; Allen AC; Wen SW; Guyon G; MacDonald RC
Chronic Dis Can; 2000; 21(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 10813688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of the automated spatial surveillance program to birth defects surveillance data.
Gardner BR; Strickland MJ; Correa A
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Jul; 79(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 17385687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of probabilistic record linkage for reported birth identification: Pró-Saúde Study.
Coutinho RG; Coeli CM; Faerstein E; Chor D
Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 42(6):1097-100. PubMed ID: 18833380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey.
Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA;
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research.
Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida.
Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations.
Cooper WO; Hernandez-Diaz S; Gideon P; Dyer SM; Hall K; Dudley J; Cevasco M; Thompson AB; Ray WA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 18081215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practitioner reporting of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technology: Does it still have a role in surveillance of birth defects?
Hansen M; Sullivan E; Jequier AM; Burton P; Junk S; Yovich J; Bower C
Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):516-20. PubMed ID: 17021189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring for new multiple congenital anomalies in the search for human teratogens.
Khoury MJ; Botto L; Waters GD; Mastroiacovo P; Castilla E; Erickson JD
Am J Med Genet; 1993 Jun; 46(4):460-6. PubMed ID: 8357024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data linkage using probabilistic decision rules: a primer.
Mason CA; Tu S
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):812-21. PubMed ID: 18988225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
