218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18986921)
21. Optical calibration for both out-of-plane and in-plane displacement sensitivity of acoustic emission sensors.
Theobald PD
Ultrasonics; 2009 Dec; 49(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 19409592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In situ pressure calibration for piston cylinder cells via ruby fluorescence with fiber optics.
Koyama-Nakazawa K; Koeda M; Hedo M; Uwatoko Y
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Jun; 78(6):066109. PubMed ID: 17614653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Feedforward correction of nonlinearities in piezoelectric scanner constructions and its experimental verification.
Graffel B; Müller F; Müller AD; Hietschold M
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 May; 78(5):053706. PubMed ID: 17552824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of acoustic pressure on ambient pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent.
Andersen KS; Jensen JA
Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 19822339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tonometric biosensor with a differential pressure sensor for chemo-mechanical measurement of glucose.
Mitsubayashi K; Ohgoshi T; Okamoto T; Wakabayashi Y; Kozuka M; Miyajima K; Saito H; Kudo H
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Jan; 24(5):1518-21. PubMed ID: 18849159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two dimensional photoacoustic imaging based on an acoustic lens and the peak-hold technology.
Zhang H; Tang Z; He Y; Guo L
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Jun; 78(6):064902. PubMed ID: 17614630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A three-microphone acoustic reflection technique using transmitted acoustic waves in the airway.
Fujimoto Y; Huang J; Fukunaga T; Kato R; Higashino M; Shinomiya S; Kitadate S; Takahara Y; Yamaya A; Saito M; Kobayashi M; Kojima K; Oikawa T; Nakagawa K; Tsuchihara K; Iguchi M; Takahashi M; Mizuno S; Osanai K; Toga H
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2013 Oct; 115(8):1119-25. PubMed ID: 23908315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Design, construction, and evaluation of a bioacoustic transducer testing (BATT) system for respiratory sounds.
Kraman SS; Pressler GA; Pasterkamp H; Wodicka GR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1711-5. PubMed ID: 16916109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimized signal processing for FMCW interrogated reflective delay line-type SAW sensors.
Viikari V; Kokkonen K; Meltaus J
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2522-6. PubMed ID: 19049933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surface acoustic wave properties of (100) AlN films on diamond with different IDT positions.
Lin ZX; Wu S; Ro R; Lee MS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1246-51. PubMed ID: 19574132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MMG measurement: a high-sensitivity microphone-based sensor for clinical use.
Courteville A; Gharbi T; Cornu JY
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Feb; 45(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 9473837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Guided wave arrays for high resolution inspection.
Velichko A; Wilcox PD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 18177150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Active acoustical impedance using distributed electrodynamical transducers.
Collet M; David P; Berthillier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):882-94. PubMed ID: 19206865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of probe-to-probe approach method for an independently controlled dual-probe scanning tunneling microscope.
Matsui A; Shigeta Y
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Oct; 78(10):106107. PubMed ID: 17979463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Attenuation coefficient estimation using experimental diffraction corrections with multiple interface reflections.
Lerch TP; Cepel R; Neal SP
Ultrasonics; 2006 Jan; 44(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16213537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic diamond anvil cell (dDAC): a novel device for studying the dynamic-pressure properties of materials.
Evans WJ; Yoo CS; Lee GW; Cynn H; Lipp MJ; Visbeck K
Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Jul; 78(7):073904. PubMed ID: 17672770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inferring the acoustic dead-zone volume by split-beam echo sounder with narrow-beam transducer on a noninertial platform.
Patel R; Pedersen G; Ona E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):698-705. PubMed ID: 19206847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A single measurement approach for the determination of the normal incidence transmission loss.
Bonfiglio P; Pompoli F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1577-83. PubMed ID: 19045649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Resizing buffer rods for ultrasound testing of food products with acoustic noise considerations.
García-Álvarez J; García-Hernández MJ; Novoa-Díaz DF; Turó Peroy A; Chávez Domínguez JA; Salazar Soler J
Ultrasonics; 2013 Jan; 53(1):294-301. PubMed ID: 22795912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reconstruction of material properties profiles in one-dimensional macroscopically inhomogeneous rigid frame porous media in the frequency domain.
De Ryck L; Lauriks W; Leclaire P; Groby JP; Wirgin A; Depollier C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1591-606. PubMed ID: 19045651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
