These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18986999)

  • 1. RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression.
    Buss JA; Kimura Y; Bianco PR
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Dec; 36(22):7029-42. PubMed ID: 18986999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of the ATPase activity of RecG and RuvAB proteins on model fork structures reveals insight into stalled DNA replication fork repair.
    Abd Wahab S; Choi M; Bianco PR
    J Biol Chem; 2013 Sep; 288(37):26397-409. PubMed ID: 23893472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remodeling of RecG Helicase at the DNA Replication Fork by SSB Protein.
    Sun Z; Tan HY; Bianco PR; Lyubchenko YL
    Sci Rep; 2015 Apr; 5():9625. PubMed ID: 25923319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of the ATPase activity of the Escherichia coli RecG protein reveals that the preferred cofactor is negatively supercoiled DNA.
    Slocum SL; Buss JA; Kimura Y; Bianco PR
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Mar; 367(3):647-64. PubMed ID: 17292398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SSB binds to the RecG and PriA helicases in vivo in the absence of DNA.
    Yu C; Tan HY; Choi M; Stanenas AJ; Byrd AK; D Raney K; Cohan CS; Bianco PR
    Genes Cells; 2016 Feb; 21(2):163-84. PubMed ID: 26766785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: I. Both RecG and RuvAB catalyze regression, but RuvC cleaves the holliday junctions formed by RecG preferentially.
    Gupta S; Yeeles JT; Marians KJ
    J Biol Chem; 2014 Oct; 289(41):28376-87. PubMed ID: 25138216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.
    Thakur RS; Basavaraju S; Khanduja JS; Muniyappa K; Nagaraju G
    J Biol Chem; 2015 Oct; 290(40):24119-39. PubMed ID: 26276393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SSB and the RecG DNA helicase: an intimate association to rescue a stalled replication fork.
    Bianco PR; Lyubchenko YL
    Protein Sci; 2017 Apr; 26(4):638-649. PubMed ID: 28078722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamics of the Interaction of RecG Protein with Stalled Replication Forks.
    Sun Z; Hashemi M; Warren G; Bianco PR; Lyubchenko YL
    Biochemistry; 2018 Apr; 57(13):1967-1976. PubMed ID: 29432678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RuvAB and RecG are not essential for the recovery of DNA synthesis following UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli.
    Donaldson JR; Courcelle CT; Courcelle J
    Genetics; 2004 Apr; 166(4):1631-40. PubMed ID: 15126385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA Helicase-SSB Interactions Critical to the Regression and Restart of Stalled DNA Replication forks in
    Bianco PR
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 32357475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation.
    McGlynn P; Lloyd RG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(15):8227-34. PubMed ID: 11459957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are the SSB-Interacting Proteins RecO, RecG, PriA and the DnaB-Interacting Protein Rep Bound to Progressing Replication Forks in Escherichia coli?
    Bentchikou E; Chagneau C; Long E; Matelot M; Allemand JF; Michel B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134892. PubMed ID: 26244508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanoscale interaction of RecG with mobile fork DNA.
    Sun Z; Wang Y; Bianco PR; Lyubchenko YL
    Nanoscale Adv; 2020 Mar; 2(3):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 33791509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of Subunit Binding Positions on a Model Fork and Displacements That Occur during Sequential Assembly of the Escherichia coli Primosome.
    Manhart CM; McHenry CS
    J Biol Chem; 2015 Apr; 290(17):10828-39. PubMed ID: 25745110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The RecG branch migration protein of Escherichia coli dissociates R-loops.
    Vincent SD; Mahdi AA; Lloyd RG
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Dec; 264(4):713-21. PubMed ID: 8980680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replication restart: a pathway for (CTG).(CAG) repeat deletion in Escherichia coli.
    Kim SH; Pytlos MJ; Sinden RR
    Mutat Res; 2006 Mar; 595(1-2):5-22. PubMed ID: 16472829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action of RuvAB at replication fork structures.
    McGlynn P; Lloyd RG
    J Biol Chem; 2001 Nov; 276(45):41938-44. PubMed ID: 11551967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Movement of the RecG Motor Domain upon DNA Binding Is Required for Efficient Fork Reversal.
    Warren GM; Stein RA; Mchaourab HS; Eichman BF
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Oct; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 30301235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG.
    Singleton MR; Scaife S; Wigley DB
    Cell; 2001 Oct; 107(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 11595187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.