BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18987708)

  • 1. America's new leadership.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):16. PubMed ID: 18987708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength through diversity.
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7019):785. PubMed ID: 15602507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obama resists research cuts.
    Semeniuk I; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Mann A; Dickey Zakaib G
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7334):313-5. PubMed ID: 21331013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cash boost for US science.
    Tollefson J; Wadman M; Monastersky R
    Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7228):364-5. PubMed ID: 19158754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obama budget backs basic science.
    Fang J; Hand E; Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Waldrop M
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):594-5. PubMed ID: 20130620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moderate flies flag for science on Capitol Hill.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):365. PubMed ID: 12660746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New president, new congress..... new hope for science?
    Wolinetz CD
    Physiologist; 2009 Feb; 52(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 19271423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-year plan for US science.
    Greenberg DS
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):781-2. PubMed ID: 20944714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lean budget leaves scientists wanting more.
    Brumfiel G; Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):424. PubMed ID: 15565115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the stimulus working for you?
    Freeman R; Block F; Greenberg D; Levi M; Segal AM; Crow M; Teitelbaum MS
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):876-8. PubMed ID: 19829353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Science Foundation facing budget let-down.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):593. PubMed ID: 14668826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US midterm elections offer little hope for science.
    Morello L
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7523):412-3. PubMed ID: 25341766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Republican win sparks fears for science funds.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6912):113. PubMed ID: 12432355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science tipped to score in Obama cash stimulus.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2009 Jan; 457(7227):240-1. PubMed ID: 19148061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Main agencies hang on to funds in skimpy US science budget.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):559-60. PubMed ID: 15703709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science gets little love in Trump spending plan.
    Science News Staff
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):795. PubMed ID: 28546167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bush asks for more physics--again.
    Hand E; Wadman M; Courtland R; Waldrop M; Tollefson J
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7179):610-2. PubMed ID: 18256626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cuts loom for US science.
    Semeniuk I; Thompson H
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. science funding. Research catches a break in catch-all spending bill.
    Mervis J; Lawler A; Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5651):1636-7. PubMed ID: 14657461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.