These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18988792)

  • 1. Grading improves transparency and quality.
    Wilson KC
    Chest; 2008 Nov; 134(5):1107; author reply 1108. PubMed ID: 18988792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying and using good practice guidelines.
    Lin KW; Slawson DC
    Am Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 80(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 19621847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading recommendations: a matter of interpretation.
    Langer D; Troosters T; Decramer M; Gosselink R
    Chest; 2008 Mar; 133(3):830. PubMed ID: 18321920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force.
    Guyatt G; Gutterman D; Baumann MH; Addrizzo-Harris D; Hylek EM; Phillips B; Raskob G; Lewis SZ; Schünemann H
    Chest; 2006 Jan; 129(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 16424429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part I: where do they come from?
    Gibbons RJ; Smith S; Antman E; ;
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2979-86. PubMed ID: 12814985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality measurement in adult cardiac surgery: part 1--Conceptual framework and measure selection.
    Shahian DM; Edwards FH; Ferraris VA; Haan CK; Rich JB; Normand SL; DeLong ER; O'Brien SM; Shewan CM; Dokholyan RS; Peterson ED;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4 Suppl):S3-12. PubMed ID: 17383407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy: Flexner Report II?
    Brekke M
    Beginnings; 2001; 21(3):7. PubMed ID: 11898323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality improvement: science and action.
    Ting HH; Shojania KG; Montori VM; Bradley EH
    Circulation; 2009 Apr; 119(14):1962-74. PubMed ID: 19364989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based quality of care.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 63(12):1279-80. PubMed ID: 20971421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus statements, evidence-based medicine and guidelines in allergic diseases.
    Bousquet J; Bieber T; Fokkens W; Humbert M; Kowalski ML; Niggemann B; Simon HU; Schünemann H
    Allergy; 2008 Jan; 63(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18053012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Universal bilirubin screening, guidelines, and evidence.
    Newman TB
    Pediatrics; 2009 Oct; 124(4):1199-202. PubMed ID: 19786453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
    Machado C; Pérez-Nellar J; Estevez M; Gonzalez E
    Neurology; 2011 Jan; 76(3):307; author reply 308-9. PubMed ID: 21242502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
    Jeret JS
    Neurology; 2011 Jan; 76(3):307-8; author reply 308-9. PubMed ID: 21302426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appraisal of evidence and control of bias in the kidney disease outcomes quality initiative guideline development process.
    Van Wyck D; Eckardt KU; Uhlig K; Rocco M; Levin A
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2007 Jan; 2(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 17699378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guideline implementation: why don't we do it?
    Solberg LI
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jan; 65(2):176, 181-2. PubMed ID: 11820484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The Guideline Manual. Development and implementation of guidelines in medicine].
    Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften & Arztlichen Zentralstelle Qualitätssicherung
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Jan; 95 Suppl 1():1-84. PubMed ID: 11233512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evidence-based pharmacotherapy and pulmonology: ways of quality achievement].
    Kosarev VV; Lotkov VS; Babanov SA
    Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk; 2007; (9):3-8. PubMed ID: 18038597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Reference programs--a tool to quality development].
    Jørgensen HS; Andersen IB; Gaub M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4405-7. PubMed ID: 12362731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical practice guidelines: appraising the evidence.
    Buie WD
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1107-9. PubMed ID: 20628271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.