1771 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18988813)
1. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Teitelbaum MS
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Early success claimed for Zerhouni's NIH roadmap.
Wadman M
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):886. PubMed ID: 15496879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH career awards. Young scientists get a helping hand.
Bhatttacharjee Y
Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5754):1601. PubMed ID: 16339420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NIH funding of the independent investigator.
Boron WF
Physiology (Bethesda); 2006 Oct; 21():300-1. PubMed ID: 16990450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Iceberg alert for NIH.
Bourne HR; Lively MO
Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6093):390. PubMed ID: 22767896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On incentives for innovation.
Alberts B
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?
Wells RD; Farnham P
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1081. PubMed ID: 17110554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. science and austerity. Darwinism vs. social engineering at NIH.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6057):753-4. PubMed ID: 22076357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Invest in postdocs.
Hoff KG
Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):880. PubMed ID: 19443765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomedical funding. A bumpy landing for cancer research.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):936-7. PubMed ID: 14963292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
Miller G; Couzin J
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. France. Will French science swallow Zerhouni's strong medicine?
Enserink M
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5906):1312. PubMed ID: 19039109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. budget 2009. NIH hopes for more mileage from roadmap.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):716. PubMed ID: 18258872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The veteran: Russ Hille.
Marshall E
Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):27. PubMed ID: 24700837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH budget. Boom and bust.
Couzin J; Miller G
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):356-61. PubMed ID: 17446363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
