These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18989498)

  • 61. Specifying and standardizing performance measures for use at a national level: implications for nursing-sensitive care performance measures.
    Riehle AI; Hanold LS; Sprenger SL; Loeb JM
    Med Care Res Rev; 2007 Apr; 64(2 Suppl):64S-81S. PubMed ID: 17406012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The five Cs of choice. Outcome measures for individuals with severe and persistent mental illness.
    Blankertz L; Cook J; Rogers S; Hughes R
    Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1997 Aug; 6(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 10169472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Developing mental health-care quality indicators: toward a common framework.
    Fisher CE; Spaeth-Rublee B; Alan Pincus H;
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2013 Feb; 25(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 23175534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.
    Bonow RO; Douglas PS; Buxton AE; Cohen DJ; Curtis JP; Delong E; Drozda JP; Ferguson TB; Heidenreich PA; Hendel RC; Masoudi FA; Peterson ED; Taylor AJ; ;
    Circulation; 2011 Sep; 124(13):1483-502. PubMed ID: 21875906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Measures of individual recovery.
    Andresen R; Oades LG; Caputi P
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2011 Oct; 45(10):900. PubMed ID: 21599545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Psychology practice: design for tomorrow.
    Goodheart CD
    Am Psychol; 2011; 66(5):339-47. PubMed ID: 21766979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Undermeasuring Overuse--An Examination of National Clinical Performance Measures.
    Newton EH; Zazzera EA; Van Moorsel G; Sirovich BE
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 175(10):1709-11. PubMed ID: 26258406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Quality assessment of medical care--a standardized scheme for the development of quality indicators].
    Zorn U; Ollenschläger G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Mar; 93(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 10355061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method.
    Hartveit M; Vanhaecht K; Thorsen O; Biringer E; Haug K; Aslaksen A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28049470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The safety attitudes questionnaire in radiology: a cornerstone of a successful quality program.
    Ikusika OM; Joseph L; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Feb; 9(2):150-1. PubMed ID: 22305704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Measuring health system performance: A new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand.
    Ashton T
    Health Policy; 2015 Aug; 119(8):999-1004. PubMed ID: 25979415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Transparent measures are essential for coordinating and rewarding quality improvement in healthcare.
    Fisher WP
    MedGenMed; 2006 Nov; 8(4):32. PubMed ID: 17415314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services.
    Burgess P; Pirkis J; Coombs T; Rosen A
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 45(4):267-80. PubMed ID: 21314238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [From clinical practice guidelines towards quality assurance].
    Kopp IB
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2011 Feb; 54(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 21290269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Quality assessment of primary care for common mental disorders in isolated communities: Taking advantage of health records.
    Lessard L; Fournier L; Gauthier J; Morin D
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(3):3224. PubMed ID: 26164064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.
    Chan KS; Fowles JB; Weiner JP
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):503-27. PubMed ID: 20150441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Policy implications of the Singapore Mental Health Study.
    Chong SA; Vaingankar JA; Subramaniam M
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2012 Jun; 41(6):258-63. PubMed ID: 22821247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Changes to the 1993 MHM "Quality Assessment and Improvement" chapter.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1993; 13(3):A1-2. PubMed ID: 10128150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. From 'reckless' to 'mindful' in the use of outcome data to inform service-level performance management: perspectives from child mental health.
    Wolpert M; Deighton J; De Francesco D; Martin P; Fonagy P; Ford T
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Apr; 23(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 24459201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Possibilities for Quality Assessment of Health Services in Therapeutic Rehabilitation.
    Bednarski P; Kiwerski J
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 22(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 32986010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.