BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18990134)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of the volume-outcome relationship in uro-oncology.
    Mayer EK; Purkayastha S; Athanasiou T; Darzi A; Vale JA
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 18990134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy.
    Joudi FN; Konety BR
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):432-8. PubMed ID: 16006859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Provision of radical pelvic urological surgery in England, and compliance with improving outcomes guidance.
    Mayer EK; Bottle A; Darzi AW; Athanasiou T; Vale JA
    BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1446-51. PubMed ID: 19549126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of hospital provider volume on outcome for radical urological cancer surgery in England.
    Hanchanale VS; Javlé P
    Urol Int; 2010; 85(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 20616525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better?
    Konety BR; Allareddy V; Modak S; Smith B
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 May; 24(13):2006-12. PubMed ID: 16648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The volume-outcome relationship for radical cystectomy in England: an analysis of outcomes other than mortality.
    Mayer EK; Bottle A; Aylin P; Darzi AW; Athanasiou T; Vale JA
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E258-65. PubMed ID: 21314812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should cystectomy only be performed at high-volume hospitals by high-volume surgeons?
    Black PC; Brown GA; Dinney CP
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Sep; 16(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 16905980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the complication rate of radical cystectomy predictive of the complication rate of other urological procedures?
    Fradet V; Allareddy V; Aaronson DS; Konety BR
    J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1054-9; discussion 1059-60. PubMed ID: 19150541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining the minimum hospital case-load to achieve optimum outcomes in radical cystectomy.
    McCabe JE; Jibawi A; Javle P
    BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 16153206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparities in access to care at high-volume institutions for uro-oncologic procedures.
    Trinh QD; Sun M; Sammon J; Bianchi M; Sukumar S; Ghani KR; Jeong W; Dabaja A; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Agarwal PK; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
    Cancer; 2012 Sep; 118(18):4421-6. PubMed ID: 22298310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy.
    Barocas DA; Mitchell R; Chang SS; Cookson MS
    Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 19395287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mortality after urologic cancer surgery: impact of non-index case volume.
    Gilbert SM; Dunn RL; Miller DC; Daignault S; Ye Z; Hollenbeck BK
    Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):906-10. PubMed ID: 18372016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship of surgeon/hospital volume with outcomes in uro-oncology surgery.
    Grande P; Campi R; RouprĂȘt M
    Curr Opin Urol; 2018 May; 28(3):251-259. PubMed ID: 29461273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding volume-outcome relationships in nephrectomy and cystectomy for cancer: evidence from the UK Getting it Right First Time programme.
    Gray WK; Day J; Briggs TWR; Harrison S
    BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):234-243. PubMed ID: 31674131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer procedures.
    Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Phillips N; Sharpin C; Gillatt D; McIntosh G; Emberton M
    J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2145-52. PubMed ID: 15538220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Candidate quality of care indicators for localized bladder cancer.
    Cooperberg MR; Porter MP; Konety BR
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19573775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the role of risk-adjusted funnel plots in the analysis of radical cystectomy volume-outcome relationships?
    Mayer EK; Bottle A; Aylin P; Darzi AW; Vale JA; Athanasiou T
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 21884357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readmissions after major urologic cancer surgery.
    Leow JJ; Gandaglia G; Sood A; Ruhotina N; Klett DE; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Sun M; Chang SL; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
    Can J Urol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):7537-46. PubMed ID: 25483761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prophylactic abdominal or retroperitoneal drain placement in major uro-oncological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on radical prostatectomy, cystectomy and partial nephrectomy.
    Kowalewski KF; Hendrie JD; Nickel F; von Hardenberg J; Nuhn P; Honeck P; Michel MS; Kriegmair MC
    World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1905-1917. PubMed ID: 31664510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital-level variation in the quality of urologic cancer surgery.
    Gore JL; Wright JL; Daratha KB; Roberts KP; Lin DW; Wessells H; Porter M
    Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(4):987-96. PubMed ID: 21792864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.