BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18990901)

  • 21. Regenerating lost alveolar socket anatomy: the internal barrier membrane technique.
    Vilardi MA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):350, 352, 354. PubMed ID: 16121753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term results from soft and hard tissue augmentation by a modified vascularized interpositional periosteal-connective tissue technique in the maxillary anterior region.
    Kim CS; Jang YJ; Choi SH; Cho KS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):484-91. PubMed ID: 21741142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Therapeutic management for immediate implant placement in sites with periapical deficiencies where coronal bone is present: technique and case report.
    Evian CI; Al-Momani A; Rosenberg ES; Sanavi F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 16796295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth.
    Cosyn J; De Rouck T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19519788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The single-tooth dental implant: practical guidelines for hard tissue augmentation.
    El-Ghareeb M; Moy PK; Aghaloo TL
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Nov; 36(11):869-84. PubMed ID: 19090073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Split palatal flap. I. A surgical approach for primary soft tissue healing in ridge augmentation procedures: technique and clinical results.
    Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Apr; 19(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 10635183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intrasocket reactive soft tissue for primary closure after augmentation of extraction sites with severe bone loss before implant placement.
    Mardinger O; Chaushu G; Ghelfan O; Nissan J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1294-9. PubMed ID: 19446219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Guided bone regeneration to repair an osseous defect.
    Carvalho RS; Nelson D; Kelderman H; Wise R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):455-67. PubMed ID: 12695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration.
    Hassan KS; Kassim A; Al Ogaly AU
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e8-e15. PubMed ID: 18805718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation with additional buccal overbuilding: a study in the beagle dog.
    Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel H; Kebschull M; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 36(10):898-904. PubMed ID: 19723136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Active implant peri-apical lesion: a case report treated via guided bone regeneration with a 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Quaranta A; Andreana S; Pompa G; Procaccini M
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 24914918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Presurgical considerations for optimal implant esthetics.
    Classi AJ
    Dent Econ; 1994 Feb; 84(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 8062987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog.
    Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel H; Bolz W; Huerzeler MB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1111-8. PubMed ID: 18983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Potential efficacy of GTR and autogenous bone graft for autotransplantation to recipient sites with osseous defects: evaluation by re-entry procedure.
    Imazato S; Fukunishi K
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 14998414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Endodontic applications of guided tissue regeneration in endodontic surgery.
    Rankow HJ; Krasner PR
    J Endod; 1996 Jan; 22(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 8618084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mineralized bone allograft-plug socket augmentation: rationale and technique.
    Wang HL; Tsao YP
    Implant Dent; 2007 Mar; 16(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17356370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
    Jung RE; Hälg GA; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19191793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Soft tissue management for primary closure in guided bone regeneration: surgical technique and case report.
    Novaes AB; Novaes AB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 9048459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The double split flap: a surgical approach for regenerative treatment of interproximal defects.
    Thalmair T; Fickl S; Bolz W; Wachtel H
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 36(10):877-81. PubMed ID: 19663999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simplified socket classification and repair technique.
    Elian N; Cho SC; Froum S; Smith RB; Tarnow DP
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 19(2):99-104; quiz 106. PubMed ID: 17491484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.