BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18991116)

  • 1. Sample size re-estimation for adaptive sequential design in clinical trials.
    Gao P; Ware JH; Mehta C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1184-96. PubMed ID: 18991116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size re-estimation for survival data in clinical trials with an adaptive design.
    Togo K; Iwasaki M
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 22328325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculations for population pharmacodynamic experiments involving repeated dichotomous observations.
    Ogungbenro K; Aarons L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1212-27. PubMed ID: 18991118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size re-estimation in clinical trials.
    Proschan MA
    Biom J; 2009 Apr; 51(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 19358221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construction of group sequential designs in clinical trials on the basis of detectable treatment differences.
    Schäfer H; Müller HH
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1413-24. PubMed ID: 15116350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):802-17. PubMed ID: 21516570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
    Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-stage sample size re-estimation based on a nuisance parameter: a review.
    Proschan MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):559-74. PubMed ID: 16022163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size and power estimation in "thorough" QT/QTc studies with parallel group design.
    Hosmane B; Locke C; Chiu YL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):578-86. PubMed ID: 20358437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive statistical analysis following sample size modification based on interim review of effect size.
    Hung HM; Cui L; Wang SJ; Lawrence J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):693-706. PubMed ID: 16022173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population enrichment designs: case study of a large multinational trial.
    Mehta CR; Gao P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):831-45. PubMed ID: 21516572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (II): sample size re-estimation.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2041-54. PubMed ID: 22733687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation for the van Elteren test adjusting for ties.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Mei Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 18991111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.