705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18992984)
1. Reduced hands-off-time and time to first shock in CPR according to the ERC Guidelines 2005.
Roessler B; Fleischhackl R; Losert H; Arrich J; Mittlboeck M; Domanovits H; Hoerauf K
Resuscitation; 2009 Jan; 80(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 18992984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical impact of the European Resuscitation Council's BLS algorithm 2005.
Roessler B; Fleischhackl R; Losert H; Wandaller C; Arrich J; Mittlboeck M; Domanovits H; Hoerauf K
Resuscitation; 2007 Jul; 74(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 17303307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of manual defibrillation technique on no-flow time during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Perkins GD; Davies RP; Soar J; Thickett DR
Resuscitation; 2007 Apr; 73(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17223245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in time to defibrillation and intubation between two different ventilation/compression ratios in simulated cardiac arrest.
Kill C; Giesel M; Eberhart L; Geldner G; Wulf H
Resuscitation; 2005 Apr; 65(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15797274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hands-off time during CPR with manual and semi-automatic defibrillation in a manikin model.
Pytte M; Pedersen TE; Ottem J; Rokvam AS; Sunde K
Resuscitation; 2007 Apr; 73(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 17270336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new defibrillator mode to reduce chest compression interruptions for health care professionals and lay rescuers: a pilot study in manikins.
Barash DM; Raymond RP; Tan Q; Silver AE
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 21091330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of chest compressions by laypersons during the Public Access Defibrillation Trial.
Rea TD; Stickney RE; Doherty A; Lank P
Resuscitation; 2010 Mar; 81(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 20044198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there any room for shortening hands-off time further when using an AED?
Rhee JE; Kim T; Kim K; Choi S
Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 19111959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defibrillator charging before rhythm analysis significantly reduces hands-off time during resuscitation: a simulation study.
Hansen LK; Folkestad L; Brabrand M
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 23158477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of AED device features on performance by untrained laypersons.
Mosesso VN; Shapiro AH; Stein K; Burkett K; Wang H
Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1285-9. PubMed ID: 19720444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?
Rea TD; Shah S; Kudenchuk PJ; Copass MK; Cobb LA
Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16046942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Ewy GA; Zuercher M; Hilwig RW; Sanders AB; Berg RA; Otto CW; Hayes MM; Kern KB
Circulation; 2007 Nov; 116(22):2525-30. PubMed ID: 17998457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defibrillation and the quality of layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation-dispatcher assistance or training?
Harve H; Jokela J; Tissari A; Saukko A; Okkolin T; Pettilä V; Silfvast T
Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):275-7. PubMed ID: 19058896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of changes to the ERC resuscitation guidelines on no flow time and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: a randomised controlled study on manikins.
Jäntti H; Kuisma M; Uusaro A
Resuscitation; 2007 Nov; 75(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 17628319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated external defibrillator program does not impair cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation in the public access defibrillation trial.
Hedges JR; Sehra R; Van Zile JW; Anton AR; Bosken LA; O'Connor RE; Moore R; Powell JL; McBurnie MA;
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jun; 13(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 16636357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can untrained laypersons use a defibrillator with dispatcher assistance?
Harve H; Jokela J; Tissari A; Saukko A; Räsänen P; Okkolin T; Pettilä V; Silfvast T
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jul; 14(7):624-8. PubMed ID: 17541030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-shock chest compression delays with automated external defibrillator use.
Berg MD; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Kern KB; Berg RA
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15733755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of neurological outcomes following witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation defibrillated with either biphasic or monophasic automated external defibrillators.
Kajino K; Iwami T; Berg RA; Hiraide A; Hayashi Y; Yukioka H; Tanaka H; Shimazu T; Sugimoto H
Emerg Med J; 2009 Jul; 26(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 19546269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study.
Fischer H; Gruber J; Neuhold S; Frantal S; Hochbrugger E; Herkner H; Schöchl H; Steinlechner B; Greif R
Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):902-7. PubMed ID: 21454006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
