198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18993081)
41. "Knickel" and dime issues: an unexplored loophole in New York's genetic discrimination statute and the viability of genetic testing in the sports employment context.
Trumble PD
Albany Law Rev; 2007; 70(2):771-93. PubMed ID: 17486717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia.
Otlowski M
Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 16789301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Genetic counseling in oncology.
Buchanan AH; Stopfer JE
JAMA; 2011 Oct; 306(13):1442; author reply 1442-3. PubMed ID: 21972303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Genetic testing and gene-based testing for familial tumor].
Sugano K
Nihon Rinsho; 2005 Dec; 63 Suppl 12():191-5. PubMed ID: 16416793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Promise and peril: new genetic discoveries and Alzheimer disease.
Relkin NR
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1998; 12 Suppl 3():S1-2. PubMed ID: 9876935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. What we may expect from ethics and the law.
White GB
Am J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 100(10):114-8. PubMed ID: 11059333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A Rawlsian approach to solving the problem of genetic discrimination in toxic workplaces.
Bohrer RA
San Diego Law Rev; 2002; 39(3):747-67. PubMed ID: 15508232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. As genetic tests move into the mainstream, challenges await for doctors and patients.
Zielinski SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):334-6. PubMed ID: 15741567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Genetic testing in cancer therapeutics.
Ezzeldin HH; Diasio RB
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jul; 12(14 Pt 1):4137-41. PubMed ID: 16857783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The cloudy crystal ball: genetics, child abuse, and the perils of predicting behavior.
Stone RD
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2003 Oct; 56(5):1557-90. PubMed ID: 15568243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Coping with genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.
Dougall AL; Smith AW; Somers TJ; Posluszny DM; Rubinstein WS; Baum A
Psychosom Med; 2009 Jan; 71(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 19124622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Pride and prejudice: avoiding genetic gossip in the age of genetic testing.
Pirakitikulr D; Bursztajn HJ
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 17682623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Oh, my aching genes! Drawing a tube of blood is just one of the many ways we unfairly judge people.
Kinsley M
Time; 1997 Sep; 150(13):102. PubMed ID: 11658121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Genetic flaws. Groups have wellness program concerns over GINA.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2009 Oct; 39(43):10-1. PubMed ID: 19972651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A calculated risk.
Merenda C
ONS Connect; 2013 Dec; 28(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 24400575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Genetic services have value beyond BRCA1/2 testing.
Hall MJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Feb; 18(2):686. PubMed ID: 19208665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Genetic information and testing in insurance and employment: technical, social and ethical issues.
European Society of Human Genetics
Eur J Hum Genet; 2003 Dec; 11 Suppl 2():S11-2. PubMed ID: 14718936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Code you.
Mettner J
Minn Med; 2007 May; 90(5):26-9, 40. PubMed ID: 17550082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The Cement Spiral.
Nisker J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):643-645. PubMed ID: 29861078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Invited comments on the Shostak and Ottman review.
Conrad P
Epilepsia; 2006 Oct; 47(10):1749-50; author reply 1755-6. PubMed ID: 17054703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
