BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18996439)

  • 1. Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination.
    Richardson MJ; Campbell WL; Schmidt RC
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jan; 449(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 18996439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A neuro-mechanical model for interpersonal coordination.
    de Rugy A; Salesse R; Oullier O; Temprado JJ
    Biol Cybern; 2006 Jun; 94(6):427-43. PubMed ID: 16525852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion.
    Kilner J; Hamilton AF; Blakemore SJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2007; 2(3-4):158-66. PubMed ID: 18633814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the human primary motor cortex activated by muscular or direction-dependent features of observed movements?
    Alaerts K; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1148-55. PubMed ID: 19100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulating discrete and rhythmic multi-joint human arm movements by optimization of nonlinear performance indices.
    Biess A; Nagurka M; Flash T
    Biol Cybern; 2006 Jul; 95(1):31-53. PubMed ID: 16699783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor contagion in young children: Exploring social influences on perception-action coupling.
    Marshall PJ; Bouquet CA; Thomas AL; Shipley TF
    Neural Netw; 2010; 23(8-9):1017-25. PubMed ID: 20732789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution.
    Bouquet CA; Gaurier V; Shipley T; Toussaint L; Blandin Y
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Mar; 25(5):519-30. PubMed ID: 17365539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Congruency effects in interpersonal coordination.
    Fine JM; Gibbons CT; Amazeen EL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1541-56. PubMed ID: 23458094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive mechanisms of visuomotor transformation in movement imitation: examining predictions based on models of apraxia and motor control.
    Gravenhorst RM; Walter CB
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 19473740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Movement coordination or movement interference: visual tracking and spontaneous coordination modulate rhythmic movement interference.
    Romero V; Coey C; Schmidt RC; Richardson MJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44761. PubMed ID: 23028607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery.
    Gentili R; Cahouet V; Ballay Y; Papaxanthis C
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 155(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 15364482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coordination of gaze and hand movements for tracking and tracing in 3D.
    Gielen CC; Dijkstra TM; Roozen IJ; Welten J
    Cortex; 2009 Mar; 45(3):340-55. PubMed ID: 18718579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The advantage of cyclic over discrete movements remains evident following changes in load and amplitude.
    Smits-Engelsman BC; Swinnen SP; Duysens J
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 16326008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-limb segmental influences on random-like movements in humans.
    Deutsch KM; Newell KM
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 367(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 15331157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interlimb coupling strength scales with movement amplitude.
    Peper CL; de Boer BJ; de Poel HJ; Beek PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18423866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements.
    Biermann-Ruben K; Jonas M; Kessler K; Siebner HR; Bäumer T; Schnitzler A; Münchau A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18433965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjustment of the human arm viscoelastic properties to the direction of reaching.
    Frolov AA; Prokopenko RA; Dufossè M; Ouezdou FB
    Biol Cybern; 2006 Feb; 94(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 16344944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stabilization and destabilization of perception--action patterns influence the self-organized recruitment of degrees of freedom.
    Calvin S; Milliex L; Coyle T; Temprado JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1032-42. PubMed ID: 15584813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of execution noise in movement variability.
    van Beers RJ; Haggard P; Wolpert DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Feb; 91(2):1050-63. PubMed ID: 14561687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.