222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18996943)
1. Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods.
Zhang H; Lundegaard C; Nielsen M
Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 18996943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematically benchmarking peptide-MHC binding predictors: From synthetic to naturally processed epitopes.
Zhao W; Sher X
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006457. PubMed ID: 30408041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans.
Hoof I; Peters B; Sidney J; Pedersen LE; Sette A; Lund O; Buus S; Nielsen M
Immunogenetics; 2009 Jan; 61(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19002680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep convolutional neural networks for pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction.
Han Y; Kim D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):585. PubMed ID: 29281985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved pan-specific MHC class I peptide-binding predictions using a novel representation of the MHC-binding cleft environment.
Carrasco Pro S; Zimic M; Nielsen M
Tissue Antigens; 2014 Feb; 83(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24447175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of human, mouse and monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8-11.
Lundegaard C; Lamberth K; Harndahl M; Buus S; Lund O; Nielsen M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Jul; 36(Web Server issue):W509-12. PubMed ID: 18463140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets.
Nielsen M; Andreatta M
Genome Med; 2016 Mar; 8(1):33. PubMed ID: 27029192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research.
Lin HH; Zhang GL; Tongchusak S; Reinherz EL; Brusic V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S22. PubMed ID: 19091022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the prediction of HLA class I-binding peptides using a supertype-based method.
Wang S; Bai Z; Han J; Tian Y; Shang X; Wang L; Li J; Wu Y
J Immunol Methods; 2014 Mar; 405():109-20. PubMed ID: 24508661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. NetMHCcons: a consensus method for the major histocompatibility complex class I predictions.
Karosiene E; Lundegaard C; Lund O; Nielsen M
Immunogenetics; 2012 Mar; 64(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 22009319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NetMHCIIpan-3.0, a common pan-specific MHC class II prediction method including all three human MHC class II isotypes, HLA-DR, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ.
Karosiene E; Rasmussen M; Blicher T; Lund O; Buus S; Nielsen M
Immunogenetics; 2013 Oct; 65(10):711-24. PubMed ID: 23900783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating peptides' sequence and energy of contact residues information improves prediction of peptide and HLA-I binding with unknown alleles.
Luo F; Gao Y; Zhu Y; Liu J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S1. PubMed ID: 23815611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structural properties of MHC class II ligands, implications for the prediction of MHC class II epitopes.
Jørgensen KW; Buus S; Nielsen M
PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e15877. PubMed ID: 21209859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TEPITOPEpan: extending TEPITOPE for peptide binding prediction covering over 700 HLA-DR molecules.
Zhang L; Chen Y; Wong HS; Zhou S; Mamitsuka H; Zhu S
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30483. PubMed ID: 22383964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking predictions of MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes in a comprehensively studied model system.
Paul S; Croft NP; Purcell AW; Tscharke DC; Sette A; Nielsen M; Peters B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007757. PubMed ID: 32453790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RBM-MHC: A Semi-Supervised Machine-Learning Method for Sample-Specific Prediction of Antigen Presentation by HLA-I Alleles.
Bravi B; Tubiana J; Cocco S; Monasson R; Mora T; Walczak AM
Cell Syst; 2021 Feb; 12(2):195-202.e9. PubMed ID: 33338400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction.
Mei S; Li F; Leier A; Marquez-Lago TT; Giam K; Croft NP; Akutsu T; Smith AI; Li J; Rossjohn J; Purcell AW; Song J
Brief Bioinform; 2020 Jul; 21(4):1119-1135. PubMed ID: 31204427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NetMHCpan-4.0: Improved Peptide-MHC Class I Interaction Predictions Integrating Eluted Ligand and Peptide Binding Affinity Data.
Jurtz V; Paul S; Andreatta M; Marcatili P; Peters B; Nielsen M
J Immunol; 2017 Nov; 199(9):3360-3368. PubMed ID: 28978689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and validation of an epitope prediction tool for swine (PigMatrix) based on the pocket profile method.
Gutiérrez AH; Martin WD; Bailey-Kellogg C; Terry F; Moise L; De Groot AS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():290. PubMed ID: 26370412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
