87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1899739)
1. Detection of bullous lung disease: conventional radiography vs digital storage phosphor radiography.
Buckley KM; Schaefer CM; Greene R; Agatston S; Fay J; Llewellyn HJ; Mrose HE; Rubens JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):467-70. PubMed ID: 1899739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
Schaefer CM; Greene R; Llewellyn HJ; Mrose HE; Pile-Spellman EA; Rubens JR; Lindemann SR
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mediastinal abnormalities: detection with storage phosphor digital radiography.
Schaefer CM; Greene R; Hall DA; Lindemann SR; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 1984298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of postprocessing on the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules with digital radiography.
Oestmann JW; Rubens JR; Bourgouin PM; Rhea JT; Llewellyn HJ; Greene R
Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 2521129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage phosphor radiography.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Tomiyama N; Jokoh T; Kohno N; Takashima S; Yamagami H; Naito H
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 8475302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Screening for tracheobronchial diseases with digital storage phosphor radiography].
Kamimura R
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 52(3):308-19. PubMed ID: 1579427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bullous lesions detected by computed tomography.
Watanabe K; Kakitsubata Y; Kusumoto S; Ono S; Hoshi H; Kodama T; Jinnouchi S; Nakayama S
Radiat Med; 1986; 4(4):119-23. PubMed ID: 3602423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography.
Bernhardt TM; Otto D; Reichel G; Ludwig K; Seifert S; Kropf S; Rapp-Bernhardt U
Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):445-54. PubMed ID: 10551225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subtle lung cancers: impact of edge enhancement and gray scale reversal on detection with digitized chest radiographs.
Oestmann JW; Kushner DC; Bourgouin PM; Llewellyn HJ; Mockbee BW; Greene R
Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):657-8. PubMed ID: 3363122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Oestmann JW; Galanski M
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.
Schaefer CM; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Wiesmann W; Haubitz B; Meschede A; Reichelt S; Schirg E; Stender HS; Galanski M
Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 1609106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
