146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18997732)
1. Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy.
Tengher-Barna I; Hequet D; Reboul-Marty J; Frassati-Biaggi A; Seince N; Rodrigues-Faure A; Uzan M; Ziol M
Mod Pathol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 18997732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions.
Cao D; Lin C; Woo SH; Vang R; Tsangaris TN; Argani P
Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Dec; 29(12):1625-32. PubMed ID: 16327435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.
Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.
Pata G; Bartoli M; Bianchi A; Pasini M; Roncali S; Ragni F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2802-8. PubMed ID: 27034079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic cavity shaving: modifications of breast cancer management and long-term local recurrence, a multicentre study.
Héquet D; Bricou A; Koual M; Ziol M; Feron JG; Rouzier R; Brouland JP; Delpech Y; Barranger E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 39(8):899-905. PubMed ID: 23773800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.
Jia H; Jia W; Yang Y; Li S; Feng H; Liu J; Rao N; Jin L; Wu J; Gu R; Zhu L; Chen K; Deng H; Zeng Y; Liu Q; Song E; Su F
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 12():289. PubMed ID: 25241216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications.
Sigal-Zafrani B; Lewis JS; Clough KB; Vincent-Salomon A; Fourquet A; Meunier M; Falcou MC; Sastre-Garau X;
Mod Pathol; 2004 Jan; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 14657957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Neuschatz AC; DiPetrillo T; Steinhoff M; Safaii H; Yunes M; Landa M; Chung M; Cady B; Wazer DE
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(7):1917-24. PubMed ID: 11932892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of perioperative techniques to attain negative margins and spare healthy breast tissue in breast conserving surgery.
Krishna KL; Srinath BS; Santosh D; Velusamy S; Divyamala KP; Sariya Mohammadi J; Kurpad V; Kulkarni S; Yaji P; Goud S; Dhanireddy S; Ram J
Breast Dis; 2020; 39(3-4):127-135. PubMed ID: 32831188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique.
Feron JG; Nguyen A; Bézu C; Antoine M; Darai E; Coutant C; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Breast; 2011 Aug; 20(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 21324697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.
Torabi R; Hsu CH; Patel PN; Dave H; Bouton ME; Komenaka IK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Mar; 398(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23184267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
