147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18997866)
1. Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study.
Tricco AC; Brehaut J; Chen MH; Moher D
PLoS One; 2008; 3(11):e3684. PubMed ID: 18997866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors predicting completion and time to publication of Cochrane reviews.
Tricco AC; Moher D; Chen MH; Daniel R
Open Med; 2009; 3(4):e210-4. PubMed ID: 21688757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey.
Runjic E; Behmen D; Pieper D; Mathes T; Tricco AC; Moher D; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():41-48. PubMed ID: 30928507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned.
Silagy CA; Middleton P; Hopewell S
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2831-4. PubMed ID: 12038926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol.
Andersen MZ; Gülen S; Fonnes S; Andresen K; Rosenberg J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 124():85-93. PubMed ID: 32413390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time to publication for results of clinical trials.
Hopewell S; Clarke M; Stewart L; Tierney J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000011. PubMed ID: 17443632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens.
Snedeker KG; Totton SC; Sargeant JM
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jun; 95(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 20338648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time to update and quantitative changes in the results of cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
Jaidee W; Moher D; Laopaiboon M
PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11553. PubMed ID: 20644625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.
Tsujimoto H; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):703. PubMed ID: 29208054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews.
Zhu L; Yang Z; Deng H; Zhang Y; Liao X; Clarke M
Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 12(1):120. PubMed ID: 37443094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in issue four for 2004 of the Cochrane Library.
Wiffen PJ
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2005; 19(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 16061463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
Grootens KP; Assendelft WJ; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in issue one for 2005 of The Cochrane Library.
Wiffen PJ
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2005; 19(3):65-8. PubMed ID: 16219616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from the 4th Issue 2008.
Zaina F
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Mar; 45(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 19293757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
