These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18999358)

  • 1. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):649-72. PubMed ID: 18999358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.
    Best M; Lawrence NS; Logan GD; McLaren IP; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 26322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus-stop association: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Chiu YC; Aron AR; Verbruggen F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 24(9):1908-18. PubMed ID: 22624606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic effects of no-go instructions.
    Liefooghe B; Degryse J; Theeuwes M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):232-241. PubMed ID: 27077956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the automaticity of response inhibition in individuals with alcoholism.
    Noël X; Brevers D; Hanak C; Kornreich C; Verbanck P; Verbruggen F
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 51():84-91. PubMed ID: 26800080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies": Correction to Best et al. (2016).
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):428. PubMed ID: 28134551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associatively mediated stopping: Training stimulus-specific inhibitory control.
    Bowditch WA; Verbruggen F; McLaren IP
    Learn Behav; 2016 Jun; 44(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 26400499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A role for set in the control of automatic spatial response activation.
    Risko EF; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18271352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1229-35. PubMed ID: 18823207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 22268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding of event files in a (go/no-go) simon task with an accessory peripheral signal.
    Maetens K; Henderickx D; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19261585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistent mapping and automatic visual search: comparing persons with and without intellectual disability.
    Merrill EC
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Nov; 48(Pt 8):746-53. PubMed ID: 15494064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. After-effects of goal shifting and response inhibition: a comparison of the stop-change and dual-task paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1151-9. PubMed ID: 18938760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):809-32. PubMed ID: 24131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition.
    Andrés P; Guerrini C; Phillips LH; Perfect TJ
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(2):101-23. PubMed ID: 18443972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: evidence from simple and selective stopping.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Psychol Res; 2005 Mar; 69(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15750869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.
    Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1349-71. PubMed ID: 14578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.