These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18999358)

  • 21. Fore-period effect and stop-signal reaction time.
    Li CS; Krystal JH; Mathalon DH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 16160823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate.
    Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():318-23. PubMed ID: 25596041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.
    Leighton J; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking.
    Verbruggen F; Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1212-28. PubMed ID: 18823206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression.
    Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sustained brain activation supporting stop-signal task performance.
    Hughes ME; Budd TW; Fulham WR; Lancaster S; Woods W; Rossell SL; Michie PT
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 39(8):1363-9. PubMed ID: 24528168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stop task after-effects in schizophrenia: behavioral control adjustments and repetition priming.
    Enticott PG; Upton DJ; Bradshaw JL; Bellgrove MA; Ogloff JR
    Neurocase; 2012; 18(5):405-14. PubMed ID: 22124369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do all inhibitions act alike? A study of go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
    Littman R; Takács Á
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186774. PubMed ID: 29065184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reduced response readiness delays stop signal inhibition.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW; Logan GD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Sep; 111(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12227433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stop-signal task difficulty and the right inferior frontal gyrus.
    Hughes ME; Johnston PJ; Fulham WR; Budd TW; Michie PT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():205-13. PubMed ID: 23973765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating implicit spider fear associations using the Go/No-go Association Task.
    Teachman BA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 17101115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stop task after-effects: the extent of slowing during the preparation and execution of movement.
    Enticott PG; Bradshaw JL; Bellgrove MA; Upton DJ; Ogloff JR
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 19439396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: evidence from a go/no-go task.
    Los SA
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):328-44. PubMed ID: 23969298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Global inhibition and midcourse corrections in speeded aiming.
    Wohldmann EL; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18927039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues.
    Lenartowicz A; Verbruggen F; Logan GD; Poldrack RA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3388-99. PubMed ID: 21452946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.