These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19000040)

  • 1. Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery.
    Marudanayagam R; Singhal R; Tanchel B; O'Connor B; Balasubramanian B; Paterson I
    Breast J; 2008; 14(6):570-3. PubMed ID: 19000040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
    Janes SE; Stankhe M; Singh S; Isgar B
    Breast; 2006 Jun; 15(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16337123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
    Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
    Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
    Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
    Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
    Mann RM; Loo CE; Wobbes T; Bult P; Barentsz JO; Gilhuijs KG; Boetes C
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 19885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique.
    Feron JG; Nguyen A; Bézu C; Antoine M; Darai E; Coutant C; Rouzier R; Uzan S
    Breast; 2011 Aug; 20(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 21324697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients.
    Malik HZ; George WD; Mallon EA; Harnett AN; Macmillan RD; Purushotham AD
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1999 Oct; 25(5):464-9. PubMed ID: 10527593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.
    Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
    Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical management modifications following systematic additional shaving of cavity margins in breast-conservation treatment.
    Héquet D; Bricou A; Delpech Y; Barranger E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 20628823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.
    O'Sullivan MJ; Li T; Freedman G; Morrow M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3133-40. PubMed ID: 17653798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separate cavity margins excision as a complement to conservative breast cancer surgery.
    Zavagno G; Donà M; Orvieto E; Mocellin S; Pasquali S; Goldin E; Mele ML; Belardinelli V; Nitti D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 20542659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
    Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.
    Cellini C; Huston TL; Martins D; Christos P; Carson J; Kemper S; Simmons RM
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 15910716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.