271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19000782)
1. Range and trend of expected toxicity level (ETL) in standard A + B designs: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Chen Z; Krailo MD; Sun J; Azen SP;
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Mar; 30(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 19000782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model-based approach in the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose in phase I cancer clinical trials.
He W; Liu J; Binkowitz B; Quan H
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2027-42. PubMed ID: 16025542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials.
Jiang H; Liu Y; Su Z
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17681867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.
Oron AP; Hoff PD
Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Tighiouart M; Kowalski J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 22561391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.
Simon R; Freidlin B; Rubinstein L; Arbuck SG; Collins J; Christian MC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Aug; 89(15):1138-47. PubMed ID: 9262252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.
Van Meter EM; Garrett-Mayer E; Bandyopadhyay D
Clin Trials; 2012 Jun; 9(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 22547420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. R-TPI: rolling toxicity probability interval design to shorten the duration and maintain safety of phase I trials.
Guo W; Ji Y; Li D
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):411-424. PubMed ID: 30744484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toxicity-dependent feasibility bounds for the escalation with overdose control approach in phase I cancer trials.
Wheeler GM; Sweeting MJ; Mander AP
Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2499-2513. PubMed ID: 28295513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond the 3+3 method: expanded algorithms for dose- escalation in Phase I oncology trials of two agents.
Braun TM; Alonzo TA
Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 21730075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model of a Queuing Approach for Patient Accrual in Phase 1 Oncology Studies.
Frankel PH; Chung V; Tuscano J; Siddiqi T; Sampath S; Longmate J; Groshen S; Newman EM
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e204787. PubMed ID: 32401317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
Gerke O; Siedentop H
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive Bayesian phase I clinical trial designs for estimating the maximum tolerated doses for two drugs while fully utilizing all toxicity information.
Zhang Y; Kutner M; Chen Z
Biom J; 2021 Oct; 63(7):1476-1492. PubMed ID: 33969525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.
James GD; Symeonides S; Marshall J; Young J; Clack G
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 33402104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Deviation From Planned Cohort Size and Operating Characteristics of Phase 1 Trials.
Park M; Liu S; Yap TA; Yuan Y
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037563. PubMed ID: 33595664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.
Cunanan K; Koopmeiners JS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():51. PubMed ID: 24731155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.
Liao JJZ; Zhou F; Zhou H; Petruzzelli L; Hou K; Asatiani E
Int J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 151(9):1602-1610. PubMed ID: 35802470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
