These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1900088)

  • 1. A comparison of materials for the buildup of severely damaged teeth.
    Huget EF; Murray GA
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1991 Jan; 71(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 1900088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength of dental amalgam bonded to dentin.
    Covey DA; Moon PC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1900693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Bonding of visible light cured composite resins to glass ionomer and Cermet cements].
    Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Apr; 44(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 2130320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite].
    Croll TP
    Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems].
    Ersoy E; Cetiner S; Koçak F
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 2518746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the physical properties of core materials.
    Saygili G; Mahmali SM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12212682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goodbye amalgam, hello alternatives?
    Williams P
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1996 Feb; 62(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 8820166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of interfacial bond strengths between amalgam and composite inlay.
    Abdel-Aziz AH; Alhadainy HA
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 9823075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.