BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19001150)

  • 1. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector.
    Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M
    Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of clinical image quality in feline chest radiography with a needle-image plate (NIP) storage phosphor system--an approach to the evaluation of image quality in neonatal radiography].
    Ludewig E; Hirsch W; Bosch B; Gäbler K; Sorge I; Succow D; Werrmann A; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2010 Feb; 182(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 19859865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of dose reduction using needle-structured image plates versus powder-structured plates for computed radiography of the knee.
    Gruber M; Weber M; Homolka P; Nemec S; Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Uffmann M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W318-23. PubMed ID: 21785059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology].
    Grampp S; Czerny C; Krestan C; Henk C; Heiner L; Imhof H
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 12764584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems.
    Körner M; Treitl M; Schaetzing R; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Wirth S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16772853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs. screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics.
    Hamers S; Freyschmidt J; Neitzel U
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1753-9. PubMed ID: 11511898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiography in the detection of wrist fractures.
    Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Pechlaner S; Künzel KH; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Gaber O; Jaschke W
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 12014869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine skeleton radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality and clinical acceptance at 50% dose reduction.
    Völk M; Paetzel C; Angele P; Seitz JS; Füchtmeier B; Hente R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 12649647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Needle image plates compared to conventional CR in chest radiography: is dose reduction possible?
    Berger-Kulemann V; Pötter-Lang S; Gruber M; Berger R; Vonbank K; Weber M; Rabitsch W; Uffmann M
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4156-60. PubMed ID: 21798682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
    Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.