256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19001394)
1. Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts.
De Deyne S; Verheyen S; Ameel E; Vanpaemel W; Dry MJ; Voorspoels W; Storms G
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1030-48. PubMed ID: 19001394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. German norms for semantic typicality, age of acquisition, and concept familiarity.
Schröder A; Gemballa T; Ruppin S; Wartenburger I
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):380-94. PubMed ID: 22190280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.
Ferrand L; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; New B; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1049-54. PubMed ID: 19001395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars.
Ruts W; De Deyne S; Ameel E; Vanpaemel W; Verbeemen T; Storms G
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):506-15. PubMed ID: 15641439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feature type effects in semantic memory: an event related potentials study.
Sartori G; Polezzi D; Mameli F; Lombardi L
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Dec; 390(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 16139955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taboo, emotionally valenced, and emotionally neutral word norms.
Janschewitz K
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1065-74. PubMed ID: 19001397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of semantic or phonemic cues in picture-naming tasks on the calculation of the objective age-of-acquisition norms: A cross-linguistic study.
Cannard C; Kandel S
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1055-64. PubMed ID: 19001396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Category norms for 500 Spanish words in five semantic categories.
Izura C; Hernández-Muñoz N; Ellis AW
Behav Res Methods; 2005 Aug; 37(3):385-97. PubMed ID: 16405134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating feature-category relations using semantic fluency tasks.
Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 15919552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semantic relevance and semantic disorders.
Sartori G; Lombardi L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):439-52. PubMed ID: 15072679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age of acquisition estimates for 1,208 ambiguous and polysemous words.
Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 21287120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.
Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Body-object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns.
Tillotson SM; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1075-8. PubMed ID: 19001398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.
De Deyne S; Storms G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 16777041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Category norm data and relationships with lexical frequency and typicality within verb semantic categories.
Plant C; Webster J; Whitworth A
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):424-40. PubMed ID: 21298568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating long-term semantic priming of middle- and low-familiarity category exemplars.
Ray S; Bly BM
J Gen Psychol; 2007 Oct; 134(4):453-66. PubMed ID: 18183740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Category-specific effects in semantic memory: category-task interactions suggested by fMRI.
Grossman M; Koenig P; Kounios J; McMillan C; Work M; Moore P
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):1003-9. PubMed ID: 16413792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [BASETY: Meaning extension and typicality of examples for 21 categories of objects].
Léger L; Boumlak H; Tijus C
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 19071989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.
Dry MJ; Storms G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 20053389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nature and facts about natural and artifactual categories: Sex differences in the semantic priming paradigm.
Bermeitinger C; Wentura D; Frings C
Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 18442848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
