375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19001395)
1. Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.
Ferrand L; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; New B; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1049-54. PubMed ID: 19001395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1,749 Portuguese words.
Cameirão ML; Vicente SG
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):474-80. PubMed ID: 20479178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Imagery norms and subjective frequency of 1,760 monosyllabic words in the French language].
Gonthier I; Desrochers A; Thompson G; Landry D
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 19485605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjective frequency and imageability ratings for 3,600 French nouns.
Desrochers A; Thompson GL
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):546-57. PubMed ID: 19363197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age of acquisition estimates for 1,208 ambiguous and polysemous words.
Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 21287120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated age of acquisition norms for 834 Portuguese nouns and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.
Marques JF; Fonseca FL; Morais AS; Pinto IA
Behav Res Methods; 2007 Aug; 39(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 17958155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Norms of subjective frequency of use and imagery for a sample of 1,916 French nouns].
Desrochers A; Bergeron M
Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Dec; 54(4):274-325. PubMed ID: 11195718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective age of acquisition for 223 Italian words: norms and effects on picture naming speed.
Lotto L; Surian L; Job R
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 20160292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words.
Della Rosa PA; Catricalà E; Vigliocco G; Cappa SF
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1042-8. PubMed ID: 21139171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of semantic or phonemic cues in picture-naming tasks on the calculation of the objective age-of-acquisition norms: A cross-linguistic study.
Cannard C; Kandel S
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1055-64. PubMed ID: 19001396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corroborating biased indicators: global and local agreement among objective and subjective estimates of printed word frequency.
Thompson GL; Desrochers A
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):452-71. PubMed ID: 19363186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Body-object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns.
Tillotson SM; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1075-8. PubMed ID: 19001398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 286 words in Russian: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables.
Grigoriev A; Oshhepkov I
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 23435657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts.
De Deyne S; Verheyen S; Ameel E; Vanpaemel W; Dry MJ; Voorspoels W; Storms G
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1030-48. PubMed ID: 19001394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.
Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):791-4. PubMed ID: 18697675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociating word frequency and age of acquisition: The Klein effect revived (and reversed).
Dewhurst SA; Barry C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):919-24. PubMed ID: 16822157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. British English norms for the spontaneous completion of three-letter word stems.
Migo EM; Roper A; Montaldi D; Mayes AR
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):470-3. PubMed ID: 20479177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the time course of lexical frequency and age of acquisition using ERP.
Cuetos F; Barbón A; Urrutia M; Domínguez A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 19101202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.
De Deyne S; Storms G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 16777041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]