209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19001450)
1. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in Australia.
Al-Badriyeh D; Liew D; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jan; 63(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 19001450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic impact of caspofungin as compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia in Australia.
Al-Badriyeh D; Liew D; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jun; 63(6):1276-85. PubMed ID: 19346292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutional experience with voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.
Shehab N; DePestel DD; Mackler ER; Collins CD; Welch K; Erba HP
Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jul; 27(7):970-9. PubMed ID: 17594202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of voriconazole vs. caspofungin in the empirical antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenia in Australia.
Al-Badriyeh D; Liew D; Stewart K; Kong DC
Mycoses; 2012 May; 55(3):244-56. PubMed ID: 21790799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus voriconazole for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia.
Collins CD; Stuntebeck ER; DePestel DD; Stevenson JG
Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 17358095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation of voriconazole compared with conventional amphotericin B for the primary treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients.
Wenzel R; Del Favero A; Kibbler C; Rogers T; Rotstein C; Mauskopf J; Morris S; Schlamm H; Troke P; Marciniak A
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Mar; 55(3):352-61. PubMed ID: 15728146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of micafungin vs. liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC).
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin MA; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
Mycoses; 2013 Sep; 56(5):532-42. PubMed ID: 23496163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of voriconazole versus posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukaemia.
Al-Badriyeh D; Slavin M; Liew D; Thursky K; Downey M; Grigg A; Bajel A; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 May; 65(5):1052-61. PubMed ID: 20237074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resource use and cost of treatment with voriconazole or conventional amphotericin B for invasive aspergillosis.
Wingard JR; Herbrecht R; Mauskopf J; Schlamm HT; Marciniak A; Roberts CS
Transpl Infect Dis; 2007 Sep; 9(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 17605747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of voriconazole vs. liposomal amphotericin B in empiric treatment of invasive fungal infections in Turkey.
Turner SJ; Senol E; Kara A; Al-Badriyeh D; Dinleyici EC; Kong DC
BMC Infect Dis; 2013 Nov; 13():560. PubMed ID: 24279677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral voriconazole for empiric antifungal treatment in patients with uncomplicated febrile neutropenia.
Przepiorka D; Buadi FK; McClune B
Pharmacotherapy; 2008 Jan; 28(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18154475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever.
Walsh TJ; Pappas P; Winston DJ; Lazarus HM; Petersen F; Raffalli J; Yanovich S; Stiff P; Greenberg R; Donowitz G; Schuster M; Reboli A; Wingard J; Arndt C; Reinhardt J; Hadley S; Finberg R; Laverdière M; Perfect J; Garber G; Fioritoni G; Anaissie E; Lee J;
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 11807146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy.
Ullmann AJ; Heussel CP; Cornely OA
N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(22):1745-7; author reply 1745-7. PubMed ID: 12041526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever.
Powers JH; Dixon CA; Goldberger MJ
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(4):289-90. PubMed ID: 11807157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy.
Danaher PJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(4):410-4; author reply 410-4. PubMed ID: 15675092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pharmacoeconomic assessment of therapy for invasive aspergillosis.
Luong ML; Husain S; Rotstein C
Mycoses; 2013 May; 56(3):338-49. PubMed ID: 23311989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treating disseminated fusariosis: amphotericin B, voriconazole or both?
Ho DY; Lee JD; Rosso F; Montoya JG
Mycoses; 2007 May; 50(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 17472622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy.
Apisarnthanarak A; Little JR; Tebas P
N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(22):1745-7; author reply 1745-7. PubMed ID: 12041527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Successsful voriconazole treatment of disseminated fusarium infection in an immunocompromised patient.
Consigny S; Dhedin N; Datry A; Choquet S; Leblond V; Chosidow O
Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Jul; 37(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 12856225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic evaluation of voriconazole versus conventional amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Germany.
Jansen JP; Kern WV; Cornely OA; Karthaus M; Ruhnke M; Ullmann AJ; Resch A
Value Health; 2006; 9(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16441520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
