These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19001702)

  • 1. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple analytical expression to calculate the backscatter factor for low energy X-ray beams.
    Chica U; Flórez G; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med; 2011 Apr; 27(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 20434382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation doses from low energy X-ray beams measured with synthetic diamond compared with calculated values obtained from the PENELOPE Monte Carlo code.
    Assiamah M; Nam TL; Keddy RJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Aug; 65(8):952-8. PubMed ID: 17482827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmark of penelope for low and medium energy X-rays.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 18495512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
    Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tenth value layers for 60Co gamma rays and for 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV x rays in concrete for beams of cone angles between 0 degrees and 14 degrees calculated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Jaradat AK; Biggs PJ
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 17429304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Hill R; Holloway L; Baldock C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):N331-44. PubMed ID: 16237233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo and
    Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of the absorbed depth-dose measurements in the beam calibration of a surface electronic high-dose-rate brachytherapy unit, a Monte Carlo-based study.
    Valdes-Cortez C; Niatsetski Y; Ballester F; Vijande J; Candela-Juan C; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):693-702. PubMed ID: 31722113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thimble ionization chambers in medium-energy x-ray beams and the role of constructive details of the central electrode: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    Ubrich F; Wulff J; Kranzer R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4893-906. PubMed ID: 18711244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Hill R; Mo Z; Haque M; Baldock C
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3971-81. PubMed ID: 19810470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of the x-ray mass energy-absorption coefficient of air using 3 keV to 10 keV synchrotron radiation.
    Büermann L; Grosswendt B; Kramer HM; Selbach HJ; Gerlach M; Hoffmann M; Krumrey M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5125-50. PubMed ID: 17019029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose and energy dependence of response of Gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Rampado O; Garelli E; Deagostini S; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2871-81. PubMed ID: 16723772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on
    Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attenuation in very narrow photon beams.
    Bjärngard BE; Tsai JS; Rice RK
    Radiat Res; 1989 May; 118(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 2498986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new NMi orthovolt x-rays absorbed dose to water primary standard based on water calorimetry.
    de Prez LA; de Pooter JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3531-42. PubMed ID: 18552419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.