186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19001703)
41. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
van Bommel R; Voogd AC; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Duijm LE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
Zheng B; Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program.
Lipasti S; Anttila A; Pamilo M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 20429762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography.
Ishiyama M; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Kikuchi M; Saida Y; Hiramatsu S
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18836795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.
Hendrick RE; Pisano ED; Averbukh A; Moran C; Berns EA; Yaffe MJ; Herman B; Acharyya S; Gatsonis C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 20093597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.
Vinnicombe S; Pinto Pereira SM; McCormack VA; Shiel S; Perry N; Dos Santos Silva IM
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 19401569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers.
de Munck L; de Bock GH; Otter R; Reiding D; Broeders MJ; Willemse PH; Siesling S
Br J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 115(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 27490807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.
Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Lederman D; Wang X; Gur D
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 85(1014):e153-61. PubMed ID: 21343322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Elmore JG; Sebuødegård S; Hoff SR; Lee CI
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24689858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting.
Ciatto S; Brancato B; Baglioni R; Turci M
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 16183238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.
Tanaka T; Nitta N; Ohta S; Kobayashi T; Kano A; Tsuchiya K; Murakami Y; Kitahara S; Wakamiya M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2886-95. PubMed ID: 19585121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessing health care use and cost consequences of a new screening modality: the case of digital mammography.
Henderson LM; Hubbard RA; Onega TL; Zhu W; Buist DS; Fishman P; Tosteson AN
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1045-52. PubMed ID: 22922432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit.
Perry NM; Patani N; Milner SE; Pinker K; Mokbel K; Allgood PC; Duffy SW
Eur Radiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 20886340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
