BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

722 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19002072)

  • 1. A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained individuals.
    Gullett JC; Tillman MD; Gutierrez GM; Chow JW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 19002072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinematic and EMG activities during front and back squat variations in maximum loads.
    Yavuz HU; Erdağ D; Amca AM; Aritan S
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):1058-66. PubMed ID: 25630691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting.
    Bryanton MA; Kennedy MD; Carey JP; Chiu LZ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2820-8. PubMed ID: 22797000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Biomechanical Comparison Between the Safety-Squat Bar and Traditional Barbell Back Squat.
    Johansson DG; Marchetti PH; Stecyk SD; Flanagan SP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):825-834. PubMed ID: 38595263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wearing knee wraps affects mechanical output and performance characteristics of back squat exercise.
    Lake JP; Carden PJ; Shorter KA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2844-9. PubMed ID: 22995993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary comparison of front and back squat exercises.
    Russell PJ; Phillips SJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Sep; 60(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 2489844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intersegmental tibiofemoral joint forces and muscle activity during various closed kinetic chain exercises.
    Stuart MJ; Meglan DA; Lutz GE; Growney ES; An KN
    Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(6):792-9. PubMed ID: 8947402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Biomechanical Comparison Between a High and Low Barbell Placement on Net Joint Moments, Kinematics, Muscle Forces, and Muscle-Specific Moments in 3 Repetition Maximum Back Squats.
    Larsen S; de Zee M; Kristiansen EL; van den Tillaar R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 38900172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association between knee extensor strength and EMG activities during squat movement.
    Fujita E; Kanehisa H; Yoshitake Y; Fukunaga T; Nishizono H
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Dec; 43(12):2328-34. PubMed ID: 21552158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of stance width on the electromyographical activity of eight superficial thigh muscles during back squat with different bar loads.
    Paoli A; Marcolin G; Petrone N
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):246-50. PubMed ID: 19130646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantified in vitro tibiofemoral contact during bodyweight back squats.
    Hale R; Green J; Hausselle J; Saxby D; Gonzalez RV
    J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 79():21-30. PubMed ID: 30197151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Net joint moments and muscle activation in barbell squats without and with restricted anterior leg rotation.
    Chiu LZ; vonGaza GL; Jean LM
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jan; 35(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26930422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press.
    Escamilla RF; Fleisig GS; Zheng N; Lander JE; Barrentine SW; Andrews JR; Bergemann BW; Moorman CT
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Sep; 33(9):1552-66. PubMed ID: 11528346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of squat depth on multiarticular muscle activation in collegiate cross-country runners.
    Gorsuch J; Long J; Miller K; Primeau K; Rutledge S; Sossong A; Durocher JJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Sep; 27(9):2619-25. PubMed ID: 23254544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of different footwear on 3-D kinematics and muscle activation during the barbell back squat in males.
    Sinclair J; McCarthy D; Bentley I; Hurst HT; Atkins S
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2015; 15(7):583-90. PubMed ID: 25331484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Load-dependent mechanical demands of the lower extremity during the back and front squat.
    Krzyszkowski J; Kipp K
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Sep; 38(17):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 32544021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyography Amplitude in the Parallel, Full, and Front Squat Variations in Resistance-Trained Females.
    Contreras B; Vigotsky AD; Schoenfeld BJ; Beardsley C; Cronin J
    J Appl Biomech; 2016 Feb; 32(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 26252837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparisons of back and front squats with a straight bar and four squats with a transformer bar.
    Goršič M; Rochelle LE; Layer JS; Smith DT; Novak D; Dai B
    Sports Biomech; 2024 Feb; 23(2):166-181. PubMed ID: 33161870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heel-Raised Foot Posture Does Not Affect Trunk and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Barbell Back Squat in Recreational Weight lifters.
    Lee SP; Gillis CB; Ibarra JJ; Oldroyd DF; Zane RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 30789547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.