These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19002366)
1. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse. Broekhuis SR; Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Vierhout ME; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Feb; 20(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 19002366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society classification: which line should be used? Fauconnier A; Zareski E; Abichedid J; Bader G; Falissard B; Fritel X Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17696158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel pelvic magnetic resonance imaging measurement for pelvic organ prolapse evaluation. Zhang C; Li X; Xie B; Gao L; Feng Y; Sun X; Luo J; Wang J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39426783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Broekhuis SR; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 19271092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Singh K; Reid WM; Berger LA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 11483907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate anterior pelvic prolapse: H line is the key. Rechi-Sierra K; Sánchez-Ballester F; García-Ibáñez J; Pardo-Duarte P; Flores-DelaTorre M; Monzó-Cataluña A; López-Alcina E Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Apr; 40(4):1042-1047. PubMed ID: 33783877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms. Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging. Woodfield CA; Hampton BS; Sung V; Brody JM Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Jun; 20(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 19434386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of two classifications systems for pelvic prolapse on dynamic MRI]. Novellas S; Mondot L; Bafghi A; Fournol M; Baudin G; Coco L; Bongain A; Chevallier P J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Pt 1):1717-24. PubMed ID: 19953059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The establishment of a 3D anatomical coordinate system for defining vaginal axis and spatial position. Sinex DCE; Bowen ST; Kashkoush A; Rosemond A; Carter D; Menon PG; Moalli PA; Abramowitch SD Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106175. PubMed ID: 34082373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging used in evaluation of female pelvic prolapse: experience from nine cases. Chi TW; Chen SH Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2007 Jun; 23(6):302-8. PubMed ID: 17525015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver variability of ultrasound measurements for the differential diagnosis of uterine prolapse and cervical elongation without uterine prolapse. García-Mejido JA; Ramos Vega Z; Armijo Sánchez A; Fernández-Palacín A; Fernández CB; Sainz Bueno JA Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2825-2831. PubMed ID: 34618192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of the perineum and pelvic floor. Barbaric ZL; Marumoto AK; Raz S Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Apr; 12(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 11296806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and intraobserver reliability for diagnosing levator ani changes on magnetic resonance imaging. Lammers K; Kluivers KB; Vierhout ME; Prokop M; Fütterer JJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 42(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 23494887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Yang A; Mostwin JL; Rosenshein NB; Zerhouni EA Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 2006286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging-identified pelvic organ prolapse in pre- and postmenopausal women without clinically evident pelvic organ descent. Cimsit C; Yoldemir T; Akpinar IN Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1418-1424. PubMed ID: 26041768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical study on pubococcygeal line determined by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging used in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse]. Miao YL; Zhang XH; Wu J; Kang Y; Hong N; Wang JL Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):900-3. PubMed ID: 21211420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines. Rosenkrantz AB; Lewis MT; Yalamanchili S; Lim RP; Wong S; Bennett GL Clin Radiol; 2014 Feb; 69(2):e71-7. PubMed ID: 24290773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between levator ani and bony pelvis morphology and clinical grade of prolapse in women. Li R; Song Y; Ma M Clin Anat; 2015 Sep; 28(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 25864568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]