These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19002884)
1. Optimization of an electroporation protocol using the K562 cell line as a model: role of cell cycle phase and cytoplasmic DNAses. Delgado-Cañedo A; Santos DG; Chies JA; Kvitko K; Nardi NB Cytotechnology; 2006 Jul; 51(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 19002884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of electrotransfection conditions of mammalian cells with different biological features. Guo H; Hao R; Wei Y; Sun D; Sun S; Zhang Z J Membr Biol; 2012 Dec; 245(12):789-95. PubMed ID: 22836669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of electroporation buffer composition on cell viability and electro-transfection efficiency. Sherba JJ; Hogquist S; Lin H; Shan JW; Shreiber DI; Zahn JD Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3053. PubMed ID: 32080269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrotransfection and lipofection show comparable efficiency for in vitro gene delivery of primary human myoblasts. Mars T; Strazisar M; Mis K; Kotnik N; Pegan K; Lojk J; Grubic Z; Pavlin M J Membr Biol; 2015 Apr; 248(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 25534347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systemic Optimization of Gene Electrotransfer Protocol Using Hard-to-Transfect UT-7 Cell Line as a Model. Vadeikienė R; Jakštys B; Ugenskienė R; Šatkauskas S; Juozaitytė E Biomedicines; 2022 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36359207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. siRNA delivery into cultured primary human myoblasts--optimization of electroporation parameters and theoretical analysis. Lojk J; Mis K; Pirkmajer S; Pavlin M Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Dec; 36(8):551-63. PubMed ID: 26388450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different parameters used for in vitro gene electrotransfer on gene expression efficiency, cell viability and visualization of plasmid DNA at the membrane level. Haberl S; Kandušer M; Flisar K; Hodžić D; Bregar VB; Miklavčič D; Escoffre JM; Rols MP; Pavlin M J Gene Med; 2013 May; 15(5):169-81. PubMed ID: 23564663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of buffer composition and plasmid toxicity on electroporation-based non-viral gene delivery in mammalian cells using bursts of nanosecond and microsecond pulses. Radzevičiūtė-Valčiukė E; Gečaitė J; Balevičiūtė A; Szewczyk A; Želvys A; Lekešytė B; Malyško-Ptašinskė V; Mickevičiūtė E; Malakauskaitė P; Kulbacka J; Novickij V Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1430637. PubMed ID: 39050682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electroporation optimization to deliver plasmid DNA into dental follicle cells. Yao S; Rana S; Liu D; Wise GE Biotechnol J; 2009 Oct; 4(10):1488-96. PubMed ID: 19830717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of transfection methods for Huh-7 and Vero cells: comparative study. Hashemi A; Roohvand F; Ghahremani MH; Aghasadeghi MR; Vahabpour R; Motevau F; Memarnejadian A Tsitol Genet; 2012; 46(6):19-27. PubMed ID: 23285746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calcein Release from Cells In Vitro via Reversible and Irreversible Electroporation. Rajeckaitė V; Jakštys B; Rafanavičius A; Maciulevičius M; Jakutavičiūtė M; Šatkauskas S J Membr Biol; 2018 Feb; 251(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 29143077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ESOPE-Equivalent Pulsing Protocols for Calcium Electroporation: An In Vitro Optimization Study on 2 Cancer Cell Models. Romeo S; Sannino A; Scarfì MR; Vernier PT; Cadossi R; Gehl J; Zeni O Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818788072. PubMed ID: 30021498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical study of gene electrotransfer efficiency based on electroporation volume and electrophoretic movement of plasmid DNA. Forjanič T; Miklavčič D Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Jun; 17(1):80. PubMed ID: 29914508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient transfection of DNA into primarily cultured rat sertoli cells by electroporation. Li F; Yamaguchi K; Okada K; Matsushita K; Enatsu N; Chiba K; Yue H; Fujisawa M Biol Reprod; 2013 Mar; 88(3):61. PubMed ID: 23390162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Optimization of electroporation parameters for ctenopharyngodon idellus kidney cells and transient expression of grass carp reovirus NS26 protein]. Li Y; Zhang YN; Lv LQ Bing Du Xue Bao; 2014 May; 30(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 25118383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of transfection methods for Huh-7 and Vero cells: A comparative study. Hashemi A; Roohvand F; Ghahremani MH; Aghasadeghi MR; Vahabpour R; Motevali F; Memarnejadian A Cytol Genet; 2012; 46(6):347-353. PubMed ID: 32214542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gene delivery in adherent and suspension cells using the combined physical methods. Kardani K; Milani A; Bolhassani A Cytotechnology; 2022 Apr; 74(2):245-257. PubMed ID: 35464169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]