241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19003704)
1. A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):28-36. PubMed ID: 19003704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):37-8. PubMed ID: 19003705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Correcting social ills through mandatory research participation.
Ho A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):39-40. PubMed ID: 19003706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to open peer commentaries on "A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?".
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):W3-4. PubMed ID: 19003693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research participation and internal normativity: understanding why people participate.
Fry CL
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):43-4. PubMed ID: 19003708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris.
Shapshay S; Pimple KD
J Med Ethics; 2007 Jul; 33(7):414-7. PubMed ID: 17601870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Striking the right balance in research ethics and regulation.
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):65. PubMed ID: 20694916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Researchers as professionals, professionals as researchers: a context for laboratory research ethics.
Elliott D
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):5-16. PubMed ID: 11655041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The moral primacy of the human being.
Parker C
J Med Ethics; 2010 Sep; 36(9):563-6. PubMed ID: 20693483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which subjects should an IRB protect? Two moral models.
Lackey DP
IRB; 1982; 4(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 11651703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Compensating injured research subjects: I. The moral argument.
Childress JF
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Dec; 6(6):21-7. PubMed ID: 993009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing research: is there an obligation on subjects to participate?
Sim J
J Adv Nurs; 1991 Nov; 16(11):1284-9. PubMed ID: 1753023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician duties in the conduct of human subject research.
Fried E
Account Res; 2001; 8(4):349-75. PubMed ID: 12481789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergent obligations to the former fetal research subject.
Kipnis K
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):54-6. PubMed ID: 21534154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. For whose protection? Another moral model.
Newton LH
IRB; 1983; 5(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: a family resemblance analysis.
Goldberg DS
J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):296-320. PubMed ID: 21606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The re-emergence of the liberal-communitarian debate in bioethics: exercising self-determination and participation in biomedical research.
Christensen E
J Med Philos; 2012 Jun; 37(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 22556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
