These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19003705)
21. No-fault compensation for human subjects injured in biomedical research: a public policy conflict. Glass JC Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(3):2-7. PubMed ID: 4034661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomedical research ethics. Iltis AS J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 12461708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review. Israel M J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):525-6. PubMed ID: 23033478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A taxonomy of value in clinical research. Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Miller FG; Brody H Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Compensating injured research subjects: I. The moral argument. Childress JF Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Dec; 6(6):21-7. PubMed ID: 993009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethical human-research protections: not universal and not uniform. Fleming DA; Reynolds D Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):21-2. PubMed ID: 19061102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research. Shamoo AE; Schwartz J Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Justice and research design: the case for a semi-randomization clinical trial. Veatch RM Clin Res; 1983 Feb; 31(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10299203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Moral issues in medical experimentation on humans. Cohen C Philos Exch; 1979; 2(5):37-51. PubMed ID: 11658450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Justice in the application of science: beyond fair benefits. London AJ Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):54-6. PubMed ID: 20526976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The ethics of research without consent in emergency situations. Richardson LD Mt Sinai J Med; 2005 Jul; 72(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16021318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Why adopt a maximin theory of exploitation? Wertheimer A; Millum J; Schaefer GO Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 20526968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Getting the justification for research ethics review right. Dunn M J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):527-8. PubMed ID: 23118467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Regional ethics organizations for protection of human research participants. Wood A; Grady C; Emanuel EJ Nat Med; 2004 Dec; 10(12):1283-8. PubMed ID: 15580245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation? Elliott C Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 26659598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Women and HIV/AIDS research: the barriers to equity. Levine C IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11659324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Protectionism and the new research imperative in pediatric AIDS. Ackerman TF IRB; 1990; 12(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11654001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethical principles in health research and review process. Tangwa GB Acta Trop; 2009 Nov; 112 Suppl 1():S2-7. PubMed ID: 19665441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]