388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19004145)
1. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
Vyas R; Supe A
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Ware J
Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
Collins J
Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Structure of text and multiple-choice questions in continuing medical education (CME) in two specialist journals].
Nobbe H; Lösche P; Griebenow R
Med Klin (Munich); 2008 Jan; 103(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 18219458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
Tarrant M; Ware J
Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC).
Schubert S; Schnabel KP; Winkelmann A
Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 19253152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options.
Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Clauser BE
Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S52-5. PubMed ID: 17001136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
Ware J; Vik T
Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [CME activities of medical journals: quality of multiple-choice questions as evaluation tool. Using the example of the German medical journals Deutsches Arzteblatt, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, and Der Internist].
Kühne-Eversmann L; Nussbaum C; Reincke M; Fischer MR
Med Klin (Munich); 2007 Dec; 102(12):993-1001. PubMed ID: 18075719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and short essay questions.
Oyebola DD; Adewoye OE; Iyaniwura JO; Alada AR; Fasanmade AA; Raji Y
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2000; 29(3-4):201-5. PubMed ID: 11713989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
McCoubrie P
Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):709-12. PubMed ID: 15763874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.
Premadasa IG
Med Teach; 1993; 15(2-3):237-42. PubMed ID: 8246720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.
Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tips for developing a valid and reliable bank of multiple choice questions (MCQs).
Sadaf S; Khan S; Ali SK
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012; 25(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 23823639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
