These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19004145)

  • 21. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.
    Raymond MR; Stevens C; Bucak SD
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30362027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.
    Rahma NAA; Shamad MMA; Idris MEA; Elfaki OA; Elfakey WEM; Salih KMA
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2017; 8():287-291. PubMed ID: 28442942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.
    Tweed M
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Sep; 19(1):354. PubMed ID: 31521151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.
    Tarrant M; Ware J; Mohammed AM
    BMC Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 9():40. PubMed ID: 19580681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement characteristics of content-parallel single-best-answer and extended-matching questions in relation to number and source of options.
    Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S21-4. PubMed ID: 18820493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.
    Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are extended-matching multiple-choice items appropriate for a final test in medical education?
    Beullens J; Van Damme B; Jaspaert H; Janssen PJ
    Med Teach; 2002 Jul; 24(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 12193322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey.
    Rogausch A; Hofer R; Krebs R
    BMC Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 10():85. PubMed ID: 21106066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Gupta P; Meena P; Khan AM; Malhotra RK; Singh T
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2020; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 33088746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of MCQs from MOOCs for common item writing flaws.
    Costello E; Holland JC; Kirwan C
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Dec; 11(1):849. PubMed ID: 30509321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An Enhancement-focused framework for developing high quality single best answer multiple choice questions.
    AlMahmoud T; Elzubeir MA; Shaban S; Branicki F
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 26996644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation into the optimal number of distractors in single-best answer exams.
    Kilgour JM; Tayyaba S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 26597452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting.
    Abdel-Hameed AA; Al-Faris EA; Alorainy IA; Al-Rukban MO
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Oct; 26(10):1505-10. PubMed ID: 16228046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
    Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Douthit NT; Norcini J; Mazuz K; Alkan M; Feuerstein MT; Clarfield AM; Dwolatzky T; Solomonov E; Waksman I; Biswas S
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():640204. PubMed ID: 34368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Is the formal quality of multiple choice questions used for continuing medical education influenced by guidelines for authors provided by the publishing houses?].
    Drossard S; Bauer D; Fischer M; Kühne-Eversmann L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Apr; 121():29-35. PubMed ID: 28416209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.