These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19004168)

  • 21. RNs failed to follow Dr.'s orders, inform Dr. or chart failure. Poteet v. National Healthcare of Cleveland, Inc., E2009-01978-COA (4/19/2011)-TN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2011 Jun; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 21789909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NJ: Post-seizure pt. falls on way to bathroom: court upheld verdict for defendant hospital.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Mar; 48(10):3. PubMed ID: 18418917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. LA: Judgment for defendants reversed: fact issues for jury precluded summary action. Gleason v. Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, 031010 LACA2,44,947-CA (3/19/2010)-LA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):3. PubMed ID: 20503498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. More about charting with a jury in mind (continuing education credit).
    Bergerson SR
    Nursing; 1988 Apr; 18(4):50-8. PubMed ID: 3352992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When the coroner calls.
    Aust Nurs J; 2003 Feb; 10(7):35. PubMed ID: 18564592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Court case: a tragic-10 minute delay.
    Nurs Life; 1983; 3(3):80. PubMed ID: 6552427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [How delegation and distribution of responsibility functions].
    Ronne Y
    Vardfacket; 1984 Jun; 8(11):36-8. PubMed ID: 6570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. FL: did physician prescribe excess dosage?: did nurse err in administering meds.?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Dec; 38(7):3. PubMed ID: 9479167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Charting: how it can keep you out of court.
    Mandell MS
    Nurs Life; 1987; 7(5):46-8. PubMed ID: 3650740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preventing patient injury: what you don't do can land you in court.
    Mandell M
    Nurs Life; 1987; 7(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3642375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Defending yourself on many fronts. Malpractice isn't all you should worry about after a patient care-incident. Here's what you need to know.
    Mo Nurse; 1997; 66(4):4. PubMed ID: 9574012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RNs fail to notify Dr. of changes: proximate cause issues.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):1. PubMed ID: 8016315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Darling case: ten years later.
    Springer EW
    Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jun; 4(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 10237792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Divided court reverses judgment NOV (notwithstanding the verdict) for physician. Dent v. Perkins.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Nov; 11(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10183977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nursing records "missing": spoilation of evidence. Case in point: Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Wash. 881 P. 2d 304--AK (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):2. PubMed ID: 7838971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A differential diagnosis is key.
    Klein CA
    Nurse Pract; 2000 Jun; 25(6 Pt 1):98. PubMed ID: 10884999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Court holds "charting by exception" policy negligent. Case in point: Lama v. Borras 16F. 2d 473 PR (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):2. PubMed ID: 7517052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Yepremian v. Scarborough General Hospital - where do we go from here?
    Barnes G
    Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Sep; 58(9):29-32. PubMed ID: 7286488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.