389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19006732)
1. Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis.
Pfaeffl WA; Kunze M; Zenk U; Pfaeffl MB; Schuster T; Lohmann C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1872-80. PubMed ID: 19006732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thresholds for interface haze formation after thin-flap femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Rocha KM; Kagan R; Smith SD; Krueger RR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 147(6):966-72, 972.e1. PubMed ID: 19327748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.
Hu MY; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD; Bowman RW; Verity SM; Mootha VV; Petroll WM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 17397742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous monitoring of corneal thickness changes during LASIK with online optical coherence pachymetry.
Wirbelauer C; Pham DT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2559-68. PubMed ID: 15617925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femtosecond sub-bowman keratomileusis: a prospective, long-term, intereye comparison of safety and outcomes of 90- versus 100-μm flaps.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Kumar DA; Chari M; Agarwal A; Jacob S; Srivastava D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 152(4):582-590.e2. PubMed ID: 21683336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.
Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dry eyes and corneal sensation after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser flap creation Effect of hinge position, hinge angle, and flap thickness.
Mian SI; Li AY; Dutta S; Musch DC; Shtein RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2092-8. PubMed ID: 19969213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.
Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Johnson N
J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 20163075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Yadav A; Jacob S; Kumar DA; Agarwal A; Akhtar R
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):392-402. PubMed ID: 20677726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Murakami Y; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1879-83. PubMed ID: 21840682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence, possible risk factors, and potential effects of an opaque bubble layer created by a femtosecond laser.
Kaiserman I; Maresky HS; Bahar I; Rootman DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 18299066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: flap dimensions with the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome using the 100-microm head.
Duffey RJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1159-62. PubMed ID: 16039490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.
Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba Mosquera S
J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 27(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 20438023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser.
Binder PS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jan; 30(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 14967265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
