These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19007543)

  • 1. A comparison of two nutrition signposting systems for use in Australia.
    Louie JC; Flood V; Rangan A; Hector DJ; Gill T
    N S W Public Health Bull; 2008; 19(7-8):121-6. PubMed ID: 19007543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Colour Me In--an empirical study on consumer responses to the traffic light signposting system in nutrition labelling.
    Hieke S; Wilczynski P
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 May; 15(5):773-82. PubMed ID: 22115180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
    White J; Signal L
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Oct; 36(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 23025366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
    Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies.
    Kleef EV; Dagevos H
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 55(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 24915389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
    Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvements in recall and food choices using a graphical method to deliver information of select nutrients.
    Pratt NS; Ellison BD; Benjamin AS; Nakamura MT
    Nutr Res; 2016 Jan; 36(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 26773780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sweet Knowledge: How Declaring Added Sugars Will Help Consumers Make Informed Food Choices.
    McDonough SP
    Food Drug Law J; 2015; 70(4):553-71, ii. PubMed ID: 26827391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of 'traffic-light' nutrition information on online food purchases in Australia.
    Sacks G; Tikellis K; Millar L; Swinburn B
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2011 Apr; 35(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 21463406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nutrition labelling: perspectives of a bi-national agency for Australia and New Zealand.
    Curran MA
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2002; 11(2):S72-6. PubMed ID: 12074190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision in nutritional information declarations on food labels in Australia.
    Fabiansson SU
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2006; 15(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 17077059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
    Withall E; Wilson AM; Henderson J; Tonkin E; Coveney J; Meyer SB; Clark J; McCullum D; Ankeny R; Ward PR
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):1241. PubMed ID: 27938403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Food Rating Scale in Food Services: From Development to Assessment of a Strategy for Consumer Healthier Choices.
    Mazocco L; Akutsu RCCA; Botelho RBA; Da Silva ICR; Adjafre R; Zandonadi RP
    Nutrients; 2018 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 30223477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer perspectives on food labels.
    Borra S
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2006 May; 83(5):1235S. PubMed ID: 16685072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nutrition claims influence health perceptions and taste preferences in fourth- and fifth-grade children.
    Soldavini J; Crawford P; Ritchie LD
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2012; 44(6):624-7. PubMed ID: 23010013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine bakery wares with label claims in Europe and their categorisation by nutrient profiling models.
    Trichterborn J; Harzer G; Kunz C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Mar; 65(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 21179051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of nutritional labelling and signposting from a European perspective.
    Buttriss JL
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2018 Aug; 77(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29433590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between a dietary quality index based on the food standard agency nutrient profiling system and cardiovascular disease risk among French adults.
    Adriouch S; Julia C; Kesse-Guyot E; Ducrot P; Péneau S; Méjean C; Assmann KE; Deschasaux M; Hercberg S; Touvier M; Fezeu LK
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 May; 234():22-27. PubMed ID: 28258849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.