These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19007606)

  • 1. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S55-61. PubMed ID: 15363695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S161-7. PubMed ID: 17055814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to design a clinical trial.
    Curtis BM; Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Med; 2003; 86():475-89. PubMed ID: 12886789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):1174-80. PubMed ID: 15066501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Interpretation of clinical studies].
    Jahrmäker H
    Med Klin (Munich); 1995 Jan; 90(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 7885305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDA draft guidance on adaptive design clinical trials: Pfizer's perspective.
    Chuang-Stein C; Beltangady M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1143-9. PubMed ID: 21058110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Potkin SG; Siu CO
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on special articles on adaptive clinical trial designs.
    Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1088-9. PubMed ID: 21058103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trial quality needs to be improved to facilitate metaanalyses.
    Chalmers TC
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Sep; Doc No 89():[1541 words; 14 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical trial designs for testing of products for dentine hypersensitivity--a review.
    Gillam DG
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1997; 45(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 9477867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of the limitations of statistical analysis of treatment outcomes used in periodontal research.
    Galgut PN
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 5(4):92-7. PubMed ID: 14604057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.
    DeMets DL
    J Intern Med; 2004 May; 255(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 15078496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials.
    Esposito E; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2009; 18(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 19378694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of minimization in clinical trials.
    Taves DR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Mar; 31(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20060500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction effects and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: more than meets the eye?
    Sevdalis N; Jacklin R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):919-22. PubMed ID: 18373582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.