111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1900849)
41. The living will. Help or hindrance?
Eisendrath SJ; Jonsen AR
JAMA; 1983 Apr; 249(15):2054-8. PubMed ID: 6834595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical, ethical and legal considerations in the treatment of newborns with non-ketotic hyperglycinaemia.
Boneh A; Allan S; Mendelson D; Spriggs M; Gillam LH; Korman SH
Mol Genet Metab; 2008 Jun; 94(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 18395481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Initiating and withdrawing life support. Principles and practice in adult medicine.
Ruark JE; Raffin TA
N Engl J Med; 1988 Jan; 318(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3275889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Physician decisions regarding life support in the intensive care unit.
Osborne ML
Chest; 1992 Jan; 101(1):217-24. PubMed ID: 1729075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Futility, shared decision making, and the doctor-patient relationship.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1992 Mar; 56(3):166. PubMed ID: 1582209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. When too much is not enough.
Ashwal S; Perkin RM; Orr R
Pediatr Ann; 1992 May; 21(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 1625946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Medically futile care: the role of the physician in setting limits.
Veatch RM; Spicer CM
Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(1-2):15-36. PubMed ID: 1621702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Withdrawing life-support technologies: perspectives on duty.
Rauzi HR
Health Matrix; 1989; 7(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10293295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Patient Self-Determination Act: benefit or burden?
Moss AH
W V Med J; 1991 Nov; 87(11):510-3. PubMed ID: 1819875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Ethical issues in the elderly with renal disease.
Del Vecchio L; Locatelli F
Clin Geriatr Med; 2009 Aug; 25(3):543-53. PubMed ID: 19765495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Orchestrating a dignified death in the intensive-care unit.
Youngner SJ
Clin Chem; 1990 Aug; 36(8 Pt 2):1617-22. PubMed ID: 2387071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [The nursing profession regarding limitation of life support treatment in the intensive care units. Technical and practical features].
Falcó-Pegueroles A
Enferm Intensiva; 2009; 20(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 19775567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. End of life decisions at the beginning of life.
Snyder RD
Med Law; 1996; 15(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 8908982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Problem of moral choice in current medicine].
Gonet T
Arch Hist Filoz Med; 1988; 51(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 3389980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Organ Support After Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pediatric Patients.
Lewis A; Adams N; Chopra A; Kirschen MP
Crit Care Med; 2017 Sep; 45(9):e916-e924. PubMed ID: 28471816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Best interests and clinical decisions.
Lawrence G
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1992 Apr; 27(4A):24, 35. PubMed ID: 1497708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Decisions about life support: being responsible and responsive.
Franklin C
Crit Care Med; 1998 Jan; 26(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 9428533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Technical zeal or therapeutic purpose--how to decide?
Crawshaw R
JAMA; 1983 Oct; 250(14):1857-9. PubMed ID: 6620482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Terminal care and the continuing need for professional education.
Scofield GR
J Palliat Care; 1989 Sep; 5(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 2795336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Dying man can stop life support, court rules.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1979 Mar; 9(3):68, 70. PubMed ID: 154029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
