BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19008716)

  • 1. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB
    J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.
    Hope SA; Meredith IT; Cameron JD
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2004 Aug; 107(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15139848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The aortic pressure wave in aortic stenosis.
    O'Rourke MF
    J Hypertens; 2009 May; 27(5):1104; author reply 1105. PubMed ID: 19390351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave.
    Takazawa K; Kobayashi H; Shindo N; Tanaka N; Yamashina A
    Hypertens Res; 2007 Mar; 30(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 17510503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.
    Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms.
    Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods.
    Mahieu D; Kips J; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; Verbeke F; Gillebert TC; De Backer GG; De Bacquer D; Verdonck P; Van Bortel LM; Segers P;
    J Hypertens; 2010 Feb; 28(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19901847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive pulse waveform analysis in clinical trials: similarity of two methods for calculating aortic systolic pressure.
    Adji A; Hirata K; Hoegler S; O'Rourke MF
    Am J Hypertens; 2007 Aug; 20(8):917-22. PubMed ID: 17679043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires intra-arterial peripheral pressures.
    Cloud GC; Rajkumar C; Kooner J; Cooke J; Bulpitt CJ
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2003 Aug; 105(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 12710885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical usefulness of the second peak of radial systolic blood pressure for estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure.
    Kohara K; Tabara Y; Tomita H; Nagai T; Igase M; Miki T
    J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Aug; 23(8):538-45. PubMed ID: 19129857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by brachial artery displacement method in high-risk surgical patients.
    Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Keller E; Seifert B; Pasch T
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1995 Nov; 12(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 8665877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of the N-point moving average method for brachial pressure waveform-derived estimation of central aortic systolic pressure.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    Hypertension; 2014 Apr; 63(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 24420554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Cheng HM; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Chen LC; Sung SH; Ding PY; Yu WC; Chen JW; Chen CH
    Hypertens Res; 2010 Jun; 33(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20339373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of generalized transfer function-derived central blood pressure for the calculation of baroreflex gain.
    Studinger P; Ungi I; Lénárd Z; Mersich B; Rudas L; Kollai M
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jun; 26(6):1156-62. PubMed ID: 18475153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].
    Chemaly E; London G; Benetos A; Darné B; Asmar R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2002; 95(7-8):637-40. PubMed ID: 12365071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability of central aortic blood pressures measured non-invasively using radial artery applanation tonometry and peripheral pulse wave analysis.
    Crilly M; Coch C; Bruce M; Clark H; Williams D
    Blood Press; 2007; 16(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 17852086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between augmentation index obtained from carotid and radial artery pressure waveforms.
    Sugawara J; Komine H; Hayashi K; Maeda S; Matsuda M
    J Hypertens; 2007 Feb; 25(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 17211244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method.
    Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.