These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1900949)

  • 21. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
    Poon P
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dingell v. Baltimore.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Apr; 244(4903):412-4. PubMed ID: 2655079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reassignment for NIH's fraud hunters.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1993 May; 341(8854):1204-5. PubMed ID: 8098089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conduct unbecoming?
    Weiss P
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A bitter battle over error.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Jun; 240(4860):1720-3. PubMed ID: 3132741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Margot O'Toole's record of events.
    O'Toole M
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6323):180-3. PubMed ID: 1645847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. NIH misconduct procedures: effect of new ruling.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1296. PubMed ID: 2003214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The aftermath of the Gallo case.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.