These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19010002)

  • 1. The meaning of "serious disability" in the legal regulation of prenatal and neonatal decision-making.
    Savell K; Karpin I
    J Law Med; 2008 Oct; 16(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 19010002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond easy answers: prenatal diagnosis and counseling during pregnancy.
    Strauss RP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Mar; 39(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 11879072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's voices: prenatal diagnosis and care for the disabled.
    Brookes A
    Health Care Anal; 2001; 9(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 11561993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Czechoslovak legal regulation of family relations affected by development in medicine.
    Dragonec J
    Med Law; 1990; 9(3):958-70. PubMed ID: 2122164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic technologies and the regulation of reproductive decision-making in Australia.
    Karpin I; Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16937786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Serious" Disability: A Medical Diagnosis or an Arbitrary Restriction of Reproductive Liberties?
    Leadbeater C
    J Law Med; 2023 May; 30(1):223-234. PubMed ID: 37271961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal diagnosis, genetics and reproductive decision-making.
    Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2001 Aug; 9(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 12116669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
    Derks-Smeets IA; Gietel-Habets JJ; Tibben A; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Geraedts JP; van Golde R; Gomez-Garcia E; van den Bogaart E; van Hooijdonk M; de Die-Smulders CE; van Osch LA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1103-12. PubMed ID: 24603131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legislating to preserve women's autonomy during pregnancy.
    Feitshans IL
    Med Law; 1995; 14(5-6):397-412. PubMed ID: 8868499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening.
    Hewison J
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 25521969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Counseling concerning prenatal diagnosis and possible handicap: psychosocial viewpoint].
    Geier H
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2001; 50(9-10):723-35. PubMed ID: 11810965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses.
    Chavkin W; Leitman L; Polin K;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123 Suppl 3():S41-56. PubMed ID: 24332234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk, medicine and women: a case study on prenatal genetic counselling in Brazil.
    Guilam MC; Corrêa MC
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Aug; 7(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 17614993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.
    Gagnon A;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Sep; 31(9):875-881. PubMed ID: 19941713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal diagnosis: From policy to practice. Two distinct ways of managing prognostic uncertainty and anticipating disability in Brazil and in France.
    Ville I; Mirlesse V
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Sep; 141():19-26. PubMed ID: 26233297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.
    Fovargue S; Bennett R
    Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 26811500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.