These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19010223)
1. Use of everolimus in de novo renal recipients: initial experience in the Greek population. Papanikolaou V; Vrochides D; Margari P; Imvrios G; Papagiannis A; Giakoustidis D; Fouzas I; Antoniadis N; Ouzounidis N; Ntinas A; Vergoulas G; Miserlis G; Solonaki F; Takoudas D Transplant Proc; 2008 Nov; 40(9):3166-9. PubMed ID: 19010223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients. Lehmkuhl HB; Arizon J; Viganò M; Almenar L; Gerosa G; Maccherini M; Varnous S; Musumeci F; Hexham JM; Mange KC; Livi U; Transplantation; 2009 Jul; 88(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19584690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Vítko S; Margreiter R; Weimar W; Dantal J; Kuypers D; Winkler M; Øyen O; Viljoen HG; Filiptsev P; Sadek S; Li Y; Cretin N; Budde K; Am J Transplant; 2005 Oct; 5(10):2521-30. PubMed ID: 16162203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study. Viganò M; Dengler T; Mattei MF; Poncelet A; Vanhaecke J; Vermes E; Kleinloog R; Li Y; Gezahegen Y; Delgado JF; Transpl Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19744284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients: a 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study. Lorber MI; Mulgaonkar S; Butt KM; Elkhammas E; Mendez R; Rajagopalan PR; Kahan B; Sollinger H; Li Y; Cretin N; Tedesco H; Transplantation; 2005 Jul; 80(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 16041270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observational study with everolimus (Certican) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients. Lehmkuhl HB; Mai D; Dandel M; Knosalla C; Hiemann NE; Grauhan O; Huebler M; Pasic M; Weng Y; Meyer R; Rothenburger M; Hummel M; Hetzer R J Heart Lung Transplant; 2007 Jul; 26(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 17613400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study. Potena L; Prestinenzi P; Bianchi IG; Masetti M; Romani P; Magnani G; Fallani F; Coccolo F; Russo A; Ponticelli C; Rapezzi C; Grigioni F; Branzi A J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jun; 31(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 22341702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant recipients treated with two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine. Spagnoletti G; Citterio F; Favi E; Rossi E; Delreno F; De Santis I; Salerno MP; Gargiulo A; Castagneto M Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1175-7. PubMed ID: 19460509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients. Vítko S; Margreiter R; Weimar W; Dantal J; Viljoen HG; Li Y; Jappe A; Cretin N; Transplantation; 2004 Nov; 78(10):1532-40. PubMed ID: 15599319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-yr safety and efficacy of everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine in de novo pediatric kidney transplant patients. Ferraresso M; Belingheri M; Ginevri F; Murer L; Dello Strologo L; Cardillo M; Parodi A; Ghirardo G; Guzzo I; Innocente A; Ghio L Pediatr Transplant; 2014 Jun; 18(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 24802342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combination of everolimus and tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients with intolerance to mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid. Balda S; Inza A; Odriozola N; Zárraga S; García-Erauskin G; Lampreabe I Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(6):2095-8. PubMed ID: 19715841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone in de novo renal transplant recipients. Holmes M; Chilcott J; Walters S; Whitby S; Akehurst R Transpl Int; 2004 May; 17(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 15107971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early steroid withdrawal protocol with basiliximab, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal-transplant recipients. Kato Y; Tojimbara T; Iwadoh K; Koyama I; Nanmoku K; Kai K; Sannomiya A; Nakajima I; Fuchinoue S; Teraoka S Int Immunopharmacol; 2006 Dec; 6(13-14):1984-92. PubMed ID: 17161352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen to everolimus in renal transplant recipients: effect on renal function and proteinuria. Morales J; Fierro A; Benavente D; Zehnder C; Ferrario M; Contreras L; Herzog C; Buckel E Transplant Proc; 2007 Apr; 39(3):591-3. PubMed ID: 17445551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. De novo everolimus-based therapy in renal transplant recipients: effect on proteinuria and renal prognosis. Loriga G; Ciccarese M; Pala PG; Satta RP; Fanelli V; Manca ML; Serra G; Dessole P; Cossu M Transplant Proc; 2010 May; 42(4):1297-302. PubMed ID: 20534285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a large, single-center comparison of dose adjustments and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Sollinger HW; Sundberg AK; Leverson G; Voss BJ; Pirsch JD Transplantation; 2010 Feb; 89(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 20177347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Offner G; Toenshoff B; Höcker B; Krauss M; Bulla M; Cochat P; Fehrenbach H; Fischer W; Foulard M; Hoppe B; Hoyer PF; Jungraithmayr TC; Klaus G; Latta K; Leichter H; Mihatsch MJ; Misselwitz J; Montoya C; Müller-Wiefel DE; Neuhaus TJ; Pape L; Querfeld U; Plank C; Schwarke D; Wygoda S; Zimmerhackl LB Transplantation; 2008 Nov; 86(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 19005406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine versus full-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate in de novo renal transplant patients: a 2-year single-center experience. Santos SM; Carlos CM; Cabanayan-Casasola CB; Danguilan RA Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):154-60. PubMed ID: 22310603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Everolimus and azoospermia, a causal relationship? About one case in a renal transplant patient]. Wetzstein M; Weestel PF; Choukroun G Nephrol Ther; 2014 Feb; 10(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 24374233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion therapy to everolimus in renal transplant recipients: results after one year. Giron F; Baez Y; Niño-Murcia A; Rodríguez J; Salcedo S Transplant Proc; 2008 Apr; 40(3):711-3. PubMed ID: 18454994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]