BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1901129)

  • 1. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electron fluence correction factors for conversion of dose in plastic to dose in water.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW; Cygler JE; Mackie TR
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 9048356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
    Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
    Swanpalmer J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.