These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1901172)

  • 1. Which depth dose data should be used for dose planning when wedge filters are used to modify the photon beam?
    Knöös T; Wittgren L
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Feb; 36(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 1901172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo study on internal wedges using BEAM.
    van der Zee W; Welleweerd J
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 12033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dose delivery based on a comparison of dosimetry calculations using open beam and wedged beam depth dose data.
    Ho AK; Podgorsak MB; Sibata CH; Shin KH
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 8703325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of computerized treatment planning system accuracy in calculating wedge factors of physical wedged fields for 6 MV photon beams.
    Muhammad W; Maqbool M; Shahid M; Hussain A; Tahir S; Matiullah ; Rooh G; Ahmad T; Lee SH
    Phys Med; 2011 Jul; 27(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 20655782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetry of large wedged high-energy photon beams.
    Podgorsak MB; Kubsad SS; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):369-73. PubMed ID: 8497224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface dose and build-up region measurements with wedge filters for 6 and 18 MV photon beams.
    Bilge H; Ozbek N; Okutan M; Cakir A; Acar H
    Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 28(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 20182845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separation of dose-gradient effect from beam-hardening effect on wedge factors in photon fields.
    Kalend AM; Wu A; Yoder V; Maitz A
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):701-4. PubMed ID: 2120559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of initial electron beam parameters on Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for radiotherapy photon beams.
    Tzedakis A; Damilakis JE; Mazonakis M; Stratakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):907-13. PubMed ID: 15125009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Depth for dose calibration in high energy photon beams.
    Sjögren R; Karlsson MG; Karlsson M; Svensson H
    Radiother Oncol; 1997 Jun; 43(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 9215793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superficial and peripheral dose in compensator-based FFF beam IMRT.
    Zhang DG; Feygelman V; Moros EG; Latifi K; Hoffe S; Frakes J; Zhang GG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 28291940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in depth-dose data between open and wedge fields for 4-MV X-rays.
    Sewchand W; Khan FM; Williamson J
    Radiology; 1978 Jun; 127(3):789-92. PubMed ID: 96487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiotherapy treatment planning with dynamic wedges--an algorithm for generating wedge factors and beam data.
    Thomas SJ; Foster KR
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Sep; 40(9):1421-33. PubMed ID: 8532756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric Characteristics of 6 MV Modified Beams by Physical Wedges of a Siemens Linear Accelerator.
    Zabihzadeh M; Birgani MJ; Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi M; Arvandi S; Hoseini SM; Fadaei M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):1685-9. PubMed ID: 27221838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose.
    Guy CL; Karki K; Sharma M; Kim S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 27929489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photon spectral characteristics of dissimilar 6 MV linear accelerators.
    Hinson WH; Kearns WT; deGuzman AF; Bourland JD
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1698-702. PubMed ID: 18561644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beam data measurements for dynamic wedges on Varian 600C (6 MV) and 2100C (6 and 10 MV) linear accelerators.
    Bidmead AM; Garton AJ; Childs PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Mar; 40(3):393-411. PubMed ID: 7732070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanned intensity modulations for 50 MV photons.
    Blomquist M; Sätherberg A; Karlsson M; Zackrisson B
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 May; 43(5):1185-97. PubMed ID: 9623649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges.
    Zhu XR; Gillin MT; Jursinic PA; Lopez F; Grimm DF; Rownd JJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2267-77. PubMed ID: 11099193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.