131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19012064)
21. A structural fingertip model for simulating of the biomechanics of tactile sensation.
Wu JZ; Dong RG; Rakheja S; Schopper AW; Smutz WP
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Mar; 26(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15036184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Finite element dynamic analysis of soft tissues using state-space model.
Iorga LN; Shan B; Pelegri AA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Apr; 12(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 19242834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative planning system for surgical robotics setup with kinematics and haptics.
Hayashibe M; Suzuki N; Hashizume M; Kakeji Y; Konishi K; Suzuki S; Hattori A
Int J Med Robot; 2005 Jan; 1(2):76-85. PubMed ID: 17518381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanics of soft tissues.
Miller K
Med Sci Monit; 2000; 6(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 11208305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of finite element analysis to the design of tissue leaflets for a percutaneous aortic valve.
Smuts AN; Blaine DC; Scheffer C; Weich H; Doubell AF; Dellimore KH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21094482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite-element modeling of soft tissue rolling indentation.
Sangpradit K; Liu H; Dasgupta P; Althoefer K; Seneviratne LD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 58(12):3319-27. PubMed ID: 21257372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future.
Camarillo DB; Krummel TM; Salisbury JK
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):2S-15S. PubMed ID: 15476646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Design and implementation of a control architecture for robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery.
Barkana DE
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Mar; 6(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 19943336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vivo measurement of solid organ visco-elastic properties.
Ottensmeyer MP
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():328-33. PubMed ID: 15458110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modelling liver tissue properties using a non-linear visco-elastic model for surgery simulation.
Schwartz JM; Denninger M; Rancourt D; Moisan C; Laurendeau D
Med Image Anal; 2005 Apr; 9(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 15721226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A technical challenge for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: precision surgery on soft tissue.
Stallkamp J; Schraft RD
Int J Med Robot; 2005 Jan; 1(2):48-52. PubMed ID: 17518378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gaze-contingent control for minimally invasive robotic surgery.
Mylonas GP; Darzi A; Yang GZ
Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Sep; 11(5):256-66. PubMed ID: 17127651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Viscoelastic characterization of soft tissue from dynamic finite element models.
Eskandari H; Salcudean SE; Rohling R; Ohayon J
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6569-90. PubMed ID: 18978443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laser-scan endoscope system for intraoperative geometry acquisition and surgical robot safety management.
Hayashibe M; Suzuki N; Nakamura Y
Med Image Anal; 2006 Aug; 10(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 16624612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interaction model between capsule robot and intestine based on nonlinear viscoelasticity.
Zhang C; Liu H; Tan R; Li H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Mar; 228(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 24525198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver.
Nava A; Mazza E; Furrer M; Villiger P; Reinhart WH
Med Image Anal; 2008 Apr; 12(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18171633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Virtual tool for bilaterally controlled forceps robot--for minimally invasive surgery.
Abeykoon AM; Ohnishi K
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 17729375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surgical robot setup simulation with consistent kinematics and haptics for abdominal surgery.
Hayashibe M; Suzuki N; Hattori A; Suzuki S; Konishi K; Kakeji Y; Hashizume M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():164-6. PubMed ID: 15718720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies.
Chandra V; Dutta S; Albanese CT
Semin Pediatr Surg; 2006 Nov; 15(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 17055957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
