These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19012660)

  • 1. Capturing abnormal personality with normal personality inventories: an item response theory approach.
    Walton KE; Roberts BW; Krueger RF; Blonigen DM; Hicks BM
    J Pers; 2008 Dec; 76(6):1623-48. PubMed ID: 19012660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.
    Samuel DB; Simms LJ; Clark LA; Livesley WJ; Widiger TA
    Personal Disord; 2010 Jan; 1(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 20458359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating competing dimensional models of personality: linking the SNAP, TCI, and NEO using Item Response Theory.
    Stepp SD; Yu L; Miller JD; Hallquist MN; Trull TJ; Pilkonis PA
    Personal Disord; 2012 Apr; 3(2):107-26. PubMed ID: 22452759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.
    Guenole N; Brown AA; Cooper AJ
    Assessment; 2018 Jun; 25(4):513-526. PubMed ID: 27056730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: findings from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions.
    Harford TC; Chen CM; Saha TD; Smith SM; Hasin DS; Grant BF
    Personal Disord; 2013 Jan; 4(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 22449066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.
    Markon KE; Krueger RF; Watson D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Jan; 88(1):139-57. PubMed ID: 15631580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maladaptive Personality Trait Models: Validating the Five-Factor Model Maladaptive Trait Measures With the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and NEO Personality Inventory.
    Helle AC; Mullins-Sweatt SN
    Assessment; 2019 Apr; 26(3):375-385. PubMed ID: 28503932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basic traits predict the prevalence of personality disorder across the life span: the example of psychopathy.
    Vachon DD; Lynam DR; Widiger TA; Miller JD; McCrae RR; Costa PT
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 23528790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits.
    Anderson JL; Sellbom M; Bagby RM; Quilty LC; Veltri CO; Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Assessment; 2013 Jun; 20(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 23297369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item response theory applications in personality disorder research.
    Balsis S; Ruchensky JR; Busch AJ
    Personal Disord; 2017 Oct; 8(4):298-308. PubMed ID: 29022734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the Evaluative Content of Personality Questionnaires Using Bifactor Models.
    Biderman MD; McAbee ST; Job Chen Z; Hendy NT
    J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(4):375-388. PubMed ID: 29319357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology.
    Anderson JL; Sellbom M; Salekin RT
    Assessment; 2018 Jul; 25(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 27827808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.
    De Fruyt F; De Clercq B; De Bolle M; Wille B; Markon K; Krueger RF
    Assessment; 2013 Jun; 20(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 23405016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the personality assessment inventory.
    Hopwood CJ; Wright AG; Krueger RF; Schade N; Markon KE; Morey LC
    Assessment; 2013 Jun; 20(3):269-85. PubMed ID: 23610235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deconstructing dependency in a five-factor world: a meta-analytic review.
    Bornstein RF; Cecero JJ
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Apr; 74(2):324-43. PubMed ID: 10879359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personality disorder dysfunction versus traits: structural and conceptual issues.
    Bastiaansen L; De Fruyt F; Rossi G; Schotte C; Hofmans J
    Personal Disord; 2013 Oct; 4(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 23834515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical types in a normal population: concurrent and construct validity.
    Smith P; Magaro P; Pederson S
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):498-506. PubMed ID: 6874987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anxiety sensitivity: relations to psychopathy, DSM-IV personality disorder features, and personality traits.
    Lilienfeld SO; Penna S
    J Anxiety Disord; 2001; 15(5):367-93. PubMed ID: 11583071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings.
    McCrae RR
    J Pers Assess; 1991 Dec; 57(3):399-14. PubMed ID: 1757868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.