These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19013630)

  • 41. Effect of pore size, shear rate, and harvest time during the constant permeate flux microfiltration of CHO cell culture supernatant.
    Stressmann M; Moresoli C
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 19194898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Membrane filtration of wastewater effluents for reuse: effluent organic matter rejection and fouling.
    Jarusutthirak C; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):225-32. PubMed ID: 11436785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of water compositions on fouling of plane organic membrane in frontal filtration: application to water and wastewater clarification.
    Sridang P; Wanichapichart P; Grasmick A
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2283-91. PubMed ID: 20418625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors.
    Remy M; van der Marel P; Zwijnenburg A; Rulkens W; Temmink H
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 19010512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater.
    Nywening JP; Zhou H
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative investigation on the impact of polymeric substances on membrane fouling during sub-critical and critical flux operation of a municipal membrane bioreactor.
    Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1849-55. PubMed ID: 19029728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Optimising the operation of a MBR pilot plant by quantitative analysis of the membrane fouling mechanism.
    Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Guinzbourg BF; Vanrolleghem PA; Schippers JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):19-25. PubMed ID: 16003957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The substitution of sand filtration by immersed-UF for surface water treatment: pilot-scale studies.
    Lihua S; Xing L; Guoyu Z; Jie C; Zhe X; Guibai L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2337-43. PubMed ID: 19901465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pore blocking mechanisms during early stages of membrane fouling by colloids.
    Wang F; Tarabara VV
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Dec; 328(2):464-9. PubMed ID: 18848335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Further insight into the roles of the chemical composition of dissolved organic matter (DOM) on ultrafiltration membranes as revealed by multiple advanced DOM characterization tools.
    Ly QV; Hur J
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 201():168-177. PubMed ID: 29524817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Membrane fouling by secondary effluent of urban sewage and the membrane properties].
    Meng XR; Zhang HZ; Wang L; Wang XD; Zhao L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 May; 34(5):1822-7. PubMed ID: 23914534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter.
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2357-68. PubMed ID: 16777172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pretreatment for membrane water treatment systems: a laboratory study.
    Wend CF; Stewart PS; Jones W; Camper AK
    Water Res; 2003 Aug; 37(14):3367-78. PubMed ID: 12834730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Recovery of protein from poultry processing wastewater using membrane ultrafiltration.
    Lo YM; Cao D; Argin-Soysal S; Wang J; Hahm TS
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Apr; 96(6):687-98. PubMed ID: 15588771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance and fouling characteristics of different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors (SCMBR).
    Jin L; Ng HY; Ong SL
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2213-8. PubMed ID: 19494461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Study of antifouling modified ultrafiltration membrane based on the secondary treated water of urban sewage.
    Meng XR; Zhao L; Wang L; Wang XD; Huang DX; Miao R
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(10):2074-82. PubMed ID: 22949236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of biofilm formation on membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Mafirad S; Mehrnia MR; Azami H; Sarrafzadeh MH
    Biofouling; 2011 May; 27(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 21604217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.