These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19014037)

  • 1. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics.
    Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2009; 7(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 19408812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of saliva substitute films on initial Streptococcus mutans adhesion to enamel and dental substrata.
    Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Handel G; Bürgers R
    J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):977-83. PubMed ID: 18789569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
    Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system.
    Eick S; Glockmann E; Brandl B; Pfister W
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15025662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of bleaching on microhardness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Malkondu Ö; Yurdagüven H; Say EC; Kazazoğlu E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 21702674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexural strength of glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramics and feldspathic veneering porcelains.
    Bottino MA; Salazar-Marocho SM; Leite FP; Vásquez VC; Valandro LF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 19432762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
    Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans.
    Al-Marzok MI; Al-Azzawi HJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20020077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques.
    Anami LC; Pereira CA; Guerra E; Assunção e Souza RO; Jorge AO; Bottino MA
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of grinding, polishing, and overglazing on the flexure strength of a high-leucite feldspathic porcelain.
    Williamson RT; Kovarik RE; Mitchell RJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 8630175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
    Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Johnston W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 25957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of polishing and finishing procedures on the surface integrity of restorative ceramics.
    Odatsu T; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A; Watanabe I; Sawase T
    Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23724550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.