577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19014037)
1. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics.
Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2009; 7(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 19408812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of saliva substitute films on initial Streptococcus mutans adhesion to enamel and dental substrata.
Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Handel G; Bürgers R
J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):977-83. PubMed ID: 18789569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system.
Eick S; Glockmann E; Brandl B; Pfister W
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15025662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
Jung M
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of bleaching on microhardness of esthetic restorative materials.
Malkondu Ö; Yurdagüven H; Say EC; Kazazoğlu E; Soyman M
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 21702674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexural strength of glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramics and feldspathic veneering porcelains.
Bottino MA; Salazar-Marocho SM; Leite FP; Vásquez VC; Valandro LF
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 19432762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans.
Al-Marzok MI; Al-Azzawi HJ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20020077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques.
Anami LC; Pereira CA; Guerra E; Assunção e Souza RO; Jorge AO; Bottino MA
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of grinding, polishing, and overglazing on the flexure strength of a high-leucite feldspathic porcelain.
Williamson RT; Kovarik RE; Mitchell RJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 8630175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems.
Amer R; Kürklü D; Johnston W
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 25957241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of polishing and finishing procedures on the surface integrity of restorative ceramics.
Odatsu T; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A; Watanabe I; Sawase T
Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23724550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
